2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The place of gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition following limited esophageal resection

Abstract: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high prevalence of mucosal damage following gastric interposition raises the question of the ideal substitute for reconstruction after an esophagectomy. Is an isoperistaltic colon transplant 52,95,96 or a jejunal interposition 97–99 a more appropriate solution? Without analyzing the organ's mucosal resistance to the damaging refluxate, they undoubtedly provide at least an ‘interposed protection’ for the esophageal remnant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high prevalence of mucosal damage following gastric interposition raises the question of the ideal substitute for reconstruction after an esophagectomy. Is an isoperistaltic colon transplant 52,95,96 or a jejunal interposition 97–99 a more appropriate solution? Without analyzing the organ's mucosal resistance to the damaging refluxate, they undoubtedly provide at least an ‘interposed protection’ for the esophageal remnant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%