1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00991557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The place of colleague evaluation in the appraisal of college teaching: A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the most part reviewers simply mention possible activities in which faculty might engage when evaluating their colleagues; Batista (5) lists twenty-two different approaches ity and validity issues concerning key roles faculty can play in evaluating their colleagues' teaching have not been addressed.…”
Section: The Role Of Colleagues In the Evaluation Of College Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the most part reviewers simply mention possible activities in which faculty might engage when evaluating their colleagues; Batista (5) lists twenty-two different approaches ity and validity issues concerning key roles faculty can play in evaluating their colleagues' teaching have not been addressed.…”
Section: The Role Of Colleagues In the Evaluation Of College Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have focused on the question of which criteria of teaching effectiveness faculty colleagues are best able to judge (5,9,II,17,36,38,43). Table 1 lists a consensus of the effectiveness criteria that can be used when colleagues are participating in a summative evaluation.…”
Section: Criteria Of Teaching Effectiveness Appropriate For Colleaguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, others have concluded that using a peer rating method would have negative effects on satisfaction of office relationships, including impaired office relationship, poor employee acceptance, less agreement between raters, leniency in ratings, and the effect of jealousies and rivalries on the evaluation (Batista, 1976;DeNisi, Randolf, & Blancoe, 1983;and, Zedeck, Imparto, Krause, & Oleno, 1974). Satisfaction with a system of peer rating within the OCES could be affected by many variables associated with the individual county office situation.…”
Section: Background For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal colleague ratings are not widely used as an important means of evaluating instructional effectiveness (Batista, 1976;Miller, 1972;Seldin, 1975). This is due in part to the lack of credible, valid, and fair methods for obtaining such ratings.…”
Section: Issues and Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%