1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf02617209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The place of cecostomy in the relief of obstructive carcinoma of the colon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Their use in left-sided colon carcinoma using a surgical approach is noted in the literature dating back to 1965. 9,10 Current usage in adults with cancer appears to be limited to decompression of the colon in patients presenting with early stage, obstructing, left-sided colorectal primary tumors prior to definitive surgery. [11][12][13] Cecostomy is also useful for delivering enemas to treat constipation and improve continence in spinal cord injury patients, and in patients with Ogilvie's syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Their use in left-sided colon carcinoma using a surgical approach is noted in the literature dating back to 1965. 9,10 Current usage in adults with cancer appears to be limited to decompression of the colon in patients presenting with early stage, obstructing, left-sided colorectal primary tumors prior to definitive surgery. [11][12][13] Cecostomy is also useful for delivering enemas to treat constipation and improve continence in spinal cord injury patients, and in patients with Ogilvie's syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube caecostomy has failed in up to 50 per cent of cases and has been condemned by many (Gregg and Dixon, 1941 ;Hendricks and Griffin, 1947;Michel and McCafferty, 1948;Albers and Smith, 1952;Hunt, 1954;Rack and Clement, 1954;Maynard and Turell, 1955). Moreover, inadequate function of the tube can be fatal (Jackson and Baird, 1967;Hopkins, 1969;Balslev et al, 1970;Norton et al, 1974). Although many reports have been unfavourable, Wanebo et al (1971) reported good results in 4 patients.…”
Section: Caecal Rupture Due To Colonic Lieusmentioning
confidence: 99%