The Place of 3D Printing Preoperative Planning in Upper Thoracic Fractures

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the clinical results of patients with upper thoracic vertebral fractures treated with pedicle screw and posterior spinal fusion with preoperative surgical planning and 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and patients treated with freehand screws.Methods: Thirty patients who underwent pedicle screw placement with a diagnosis of upper thoracic fracture between June 2018 and October 2020 were included in our study. Pedicle screws were used in 15 patients (group 1) after the planning was completed with the help of 3D preoperative printing and modeling. Pedicle screws were applied in 15 patients in the control group (group 2) using the freehand technique. Intraoperative bleeding amount, pedicle screw insertion time, and correct screw placement data in both groups were recorded. The time of insertion of each pedicle screw was recorded.Results: The operation time was 134 ± 22 minutes for group 1 and 152 ± 38 minutes for group 2. The difference in operation times was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). Based on axial and sagittal reconstruction images, the accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement (grade 0 and 1) in group I was 96.5% compared to 84.2% in group II. Analyzing axial reconstruction images alone, the overall perforation rate was 10.3% in group I compared to 26.3% in group II. The minor perforation rate (Grade 1, <2 mm) was 7.0% in group I compared to 12.2% in group II. The moderate perforation rate (grade 2, 2-4 mm) was 3.4% in group I compared to 14% in group II. The severe perforation rate (grade 3, > 4 mm) was 1.7% in group II. The difference in overall accuracy rates between the two groups was significant (p<0.05).Conclusions: For 3D models of upper thoracic pedicle screw insertion, guide plates can be produced inexpensively and individually. It provides a new method for the accurate placement of upper thoracic pedicle screws with high accuracy and secure use in screw insertion.