2015
DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.6835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pivot in Chinese Cybergovernance

Abstract: China p erspe ct ives S peci al feature The Pivot in Chinese Cybergovernance I nte grat i ng In t er ne t C on tro l in X i Jinp in g's Chin a ROG IE R C RE E ME RS ABSTRACT: During the first two years of the Xi administration, a series of successive measures were taken to restructure the way that the Chinese Internet is governed. New institutions were created to centralise governance over a sphere that had hitherto been fragmented, while the pursuit of ideological and technological security led to greater eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Publics taking the initiative to organise and conduct "crusades" of their own volition, not awaiting or seeking permission and guidance from official actors is a feature of cyber-nationalism. This does not imply a loosening of controls: The state has centralised and increased the sophistication of its management of online public opinion through a combination of propaganda, censorship, and techno-legal frameworks (Creemers, 2015). In part, the intensification and expansion of the cyber-governance architecture in recent years is driven by the threat of "rogue" popular nationalism and the challenge it represents to the conduct of foreign policy.…”
Section: Foreign Policy and Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publics taking the initiative to organise and conduct "crusades" of their own volition, not awaiting or seeking permission and guidance from official actors is a feature of cyber-nationalism. This does not imply a loosening of controls: The state has centralised and increased the sophistication of its management of online public opinion through a combination of propaganda, censorship, and techno-legal frameworks (Creemers, 2015). In part, the intensification and expansion of the cyber-governance architecture in recent years is driven by the threat of "rogue" popular nationalism and the challenge it represents to the conduct of foreign policy.…”
Section: Foreign Policy and Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%