2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
932
7
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,188 publications
(977 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
26
932
7
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor analytical studies of the PSQI have mostly found a single factor although some studies have reported a three factor model [12][13][14][15]. In many studies ''use of sleep medications'' did not load well into the one factor model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor analytical studies of the PSQI have mostly found a single factor although some studies have reported a three factor model [12][13][14][15]. In many studies ''use of sleep medications'' did not load well into the one factor model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency of the PSQI is high α = 0.83 (Buysse et al, 1989). The questionnaire has been psychometrically evaluated in non-clinical groups (Mollayeva et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores higher is related to the quality of sleep are more unfavorable (Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman, & Kupfer, 1989). Reliability and validity of this questionnaire have been confirmed in other studies (Alsaadi et al, 2013;Farhadi Nasab & Azimi, 2008;Mollayeva et al, 2015). According to the designers of the questionnaire, a score greater than 5 indicates a poor sleep quality (Ağargün, Kara, & Anlar, 1996;Aloba, Adewuya, Ola, & Mapayi, 2007;Doi et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sleep Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 57%