2017
DOI: 10.1525/luminos.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pitfalls of Protection: Gender, Violence, and Power in Afghanistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…vi For an insightful analysis of the resulting tensions and contradictions from a gender perspective, see Wimpelmann 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vi For an insightful analysis of the resulting tensions and contradictions from a gender perspective, see Wimpelmann 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At any one time since 2001, between 300 and 600 women have been incarcerated in Afghan prisons for “moral crimes” such as adultery, attempted adultery, and “running away from home” (HRW 2013, 2016). The women imprisoned for such “moral crimes” have been one of the main issues of focus for the vast, largely externally funded efforts to improve women’s rights with the Afghan justice sector since the US-led overthrow of the Taliban government (Billaud 2015; Hakimi and Wimpelmann 2018; Wimpelmann 2017a). Activists and human rights workers—both local and international—have kept track of the number of women in jail for moral crimes, provided legal aid, and engaged systematically with Afghan authorities on the issue.…”
Section: Women’s “Moral Crimes” In Afghanistanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cislaghi et al (2019) note that even in highly patriarchal contexts, women can find ways to navigate and resist oppressive power from within the spaces allowed by patriarchal gender systems. In Afghanistan, while women are undoubtedly resourceful in navigating the complex politics and creating spaces for agency and change within these conditions (Billaud 2015;Wimpelmann 2017), in contexts of poverty and gender inequalities, such opportunities are highly constrained. Afghan women continue to negotiate a range of expectations and limitations including demands for social change, respect for and adherence to tradition and potential backlash and reversal of rights (Brodsky 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's mobility, particularly in rural settings, is often highly constrained due to concerns about the policing of women's sexuality and maintaining the honour of the family, leading to purdah or the 'protection' and control of women through seclusion and veiling (Boesen 2004). Under the Mujahideen regime (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996) and Taliban regime (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001), women's mobility was tightly controlled (Ahmed-Gosh 2003), particularly under the latter, with the Taliban government introducing and enforcing a universal regulation that women were not permitted to leave their homes without a mahram (male relative) (Ahmed-Gosh 2003;Wimpelmann 2017). While post-Taliban this has tended to ease off, women, particularly in rural areas, are still often expected to be accompanied by a mahram when in public, partly to avoid verbal and physical intimidation, harassment or violence from unrelated men or other community members (AREU 2013;Ganesh 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%