2008
DOI: 10.3181/0709-mr-262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pig as an Experimental Model for Elucidating the Mechanisms Governing Dietary Influence on Mineral Absorption

Abstract: This review highlights the similarities between pigs and humans and thereby the value of the porcine human nutritional model, and reviews some of the more recent applications of this model for nutritional research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
181
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(181 reference statements)
2
181
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The small intestine of adult pig is around 15-22 m, whereas the large intestine has an average length of 4-6 m. In contrast, the small intestine of a human adult averages around 5.5-7 m, whereas the large intestine is around 1.5 m. In spite of these differences, the porcine digestive and metabolic processes function in much the same way as those of humans, and digest transit times are also similar between the two species. The intestinal villus structure and component epithelial cells are also very much alike, which makes pigs an ideal model for human nutritional studies to investigate bioavailability and digestibility of various dietary factors in gastrointestinal compartments (Patterson et al 2008).…”
Section: Micronutrient Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small intestine of adult pig is around 15-22 m, whereas the large intestine has an average length of 4-6 m. In contrast, the small intestine of a human adult averages around 5.5-7 m, whereas the large intestine is around 1.5 m. In spite of these differences, the porcine digestive and metabolic processes function in much the same way as those of humans, and digest transit times are also similar between the two species. The intestinal villus structure and component epithelial cells are also very much alike, which makes pigs an ideal model for human nutritional studies to investigate bioavailability and digestibility of various dietary factors in gastrointestinal compartments (Patterson et al 2008).…”
Section: Micronutrient Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomic (stomach to cecum) and histologic structure of the pig intestine as well as the physiologic and immunologic functions of the intestine are similar to humans. Pigs produce similar digestive enzymes, transport and secretory proteins, and their capacity to absorb water and nutrients are comparable with people (Patterson, Lei, & Miller, 2008;Zhang, Widmer, & Tzipori, 2013). Pigs also have high numbers of plasma and intraepithelial γδ T cells, and they are an excellent model to examine the effects γδ T cells on the induction of IBD (Kazen & Adams, 2011).…”
Section: Considerations For Choosing the Most Appropriate Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-mail: javierdc@ugr.es A variety of experimental models have been used in studies related to iron through the time (Latunde-Dada et al, 1998;Srigiridhar and Nair, 2000;Morgan and Oates, 2002;Troost et al, 2003;Nagababu et al, 2008;Quintero et al, 2008;Jin et al, 2009;Latunde-Dada, 2009). Nevertheless, in vitro systems or animal models have different iron metabolism behaviour when compared with humans (Latunde-Dada et al, 1998;Vaghefi et al, 2005;Patterson et al, 2008;Quintero et al, 2008). Studies related to iron involve different procedures including isotopic techniques, simulated enzymatic gastrointestinal digestion or hemoglobin (Hb) depletion-repletion (Srigiridhar and Nair, 2000;Beach et al, 2003;Vaghefi et al, 2005;Kolachala et al, 2007;Quintero et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%