2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24264-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pickup and Delivery Problem with Cross-Docking Opportunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…up to 8%). In addition, Petersen and Røpke (2011) investigate the PDP with crossdocking opportunities (PDPCD). The authors propose a large neighbourhood search heuristic for the PDPCD.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…up to 8%). In addition, Petersen and Røpke (2011) investigate the PDP with crossdocking opportunities (PDPCD). The authors propose a large neighbourhood search heuristic for the PDPCD.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important difference between these two models is related to the objective considered: PDPCD is aimed at minimizing the total travel costs, whereas the PDPTWT usually calls for the maximization of user convenience (i.e., minimize passenger ride time). The first study on a practical PDPCD application with time windows is presented by Petersen and Ropke (2011). A Large Neighborhood Search metaheuristic algorithm is developed to minimize the total travel costs for real-life problem instances of 500-1,000 requests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their objective is to minimize the makespan. Petersen and Ropke [20] present an ALNS for a pickup and delivery problem with a single transfer point, concerning the transportation of flowers in Denmark. The algorithm is evaluated on real-life instances containing up to 982 requests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%