2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0507-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physics of Quantum Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 As was shown in [1], the Pohlmeyer-reduced theory in the q = 0 case depends on q only through the mass scaleμ =qµ, i.e. its relativistic S-matrix is actually independent of q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…21 As was shown in [1], the Pohlmeyer-reduced theory in the q = 0 case depends on q only through the mass scaleμ =qµ, i.e. its relativistic S-matrix is actually independent of q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The AdS 3 × S 3 × S 3 × S 1 supported just by RR flux (q = 0) depends on α ∈ (0, 1) [11,28,12] 22 so one may compare this one-parameter generalization of AdS 3 × S 3 × T 4 with the one (with NSNS flux parameter q) we discussed in this paper. One obvious difference is that the two theories have different 21 Here k stands for the coefficient in front of the action of the Pohlmeyer-reduced theory. 22 The radii of the two spheres are given by R 2 1 = α −1 , R 2 2 = (1 − α) −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally in Sec. 4 we discuss how the canonical equivalence between the phase space variables of the two models can also be used to establish the equivalence of the disorder soliton like operators of each formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%