2007
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/7/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physics of electron internal transport barriers in the TCV tokamak

Abstract: Electron internal transport barriers (eITBs) are generated in the TCV tokamak with strong electron cyclotron resonance heating in a variety of conditions, ranging from steady-state fully noninductive scenarios to stationary discharges with a finite inductive component and finally to transient current ramps without current drive. The confinement improvement over L-mode ranges from 3 to 6; the bootstrap current fraction is invariably large and is above 70% in the highest confinement cases, with good current prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coincides with a region of null magnetic shear, where the density of rational surfaces and thus the probability of mode coupling are lowered. This is similar to what is described in [7] for tokamaks, where in the presence of dominant electron heating a reversed magnetic shear and especially a shear null represent a sufficient condition for a strong electron barrier to develop [8,9]. In RFX-mod, the SHAx states are accompanied by significant E × B sheared poloidal flow.…”
Section: Highlightssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This coincides with a region of null magnetic shear, where the density of rational surfaces and thus the probability of mode coupling are lowered. This is similar to what is described in [7] for tokamaks, where in the presence of dominant electron heating a reversed magnetic shear and especially a shear null represent a sufficient condition for a strong electron barrier to develop [8,9]. In RFX-mod, the SHAx states are accompanied by significant E × B sheared poloidal flow.…”
Section: Highlightssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The density peaking in the C-Mod ITBs was thought to result from the Ware pinch, with the ITB density gradient during electron heating determined by the balance of Ware pinch and TEM turbulent fluxes, thus acquiring a strong inverse dependence on temperature. In TCV electron ITBs, where transport barriers are seen mainly on the electron temperature profile [5], the density peaking results from a strong thermodiffusive pinch [6] component which can be explained [3] using the quasi-linear model that shall be used in this paper .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While tokamaks remain the front runners for the first generation of thermonuclear fusion power plants, the need to provide continuous electrical power makes steady state (SS) operation of future tokamak reactors more attractive than the pulsed mode associated with purely Ohmic (OH) inductive drive which, on top of the cyclic thermal and mechanical stresses it implies, must rely on some energy storage system to feed the electrical grid during transformer recharge [1]. Internal transport barriers (ITBs) have hence become a milestone in the route to SS economically viable fusion reactors: besides improving core confinement, their steep pressure gradient induces very large fractions of the selfgenerated bootstrap (BS) current, enabling the plasma current to be fully driven non-inductively with only a small amount of power recirculated to the external current drive (CD) sources, in so-called advanced tokamak (AT) scenarios which have attracted increasing interest [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. According to present-day theoretical understanding and experimental evidence, two key ingredients for ITB formation and sustainment are the shears in the magnetic field and in the E × B drift velocity, s and ω E×B , respectively, the emerging picture being that ITB dynamics is mainly governed by some synergistic combination of the stabilizing effects due to reversed, non-positive s and high ω E×B , the latter shearing rate being compared with the linear growth rate of ion temperature gradient (ITG) modes or of some other type of drift-wave plasma instabilities [2][3][4][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%