2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1387590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physics of Earthquakes

Abstract: Seismologists have never directly observed rupture in Earth’s interior. Instead, they glean information from seismic waves, geodetic measurements, and numerical experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
375
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
15
375
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies of dynamic friction confirm that slip weakening by up to one order of magnitude is common as the slip rate approaches values inferred for large earthquakes, though the mechanisms of weakening are debated 13,14 . The evolution of the coefficient of friction on a fault surface during and after an earthquake is time-dependent 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experimental studies of dynamic friction confirm that slip weakening by up to one order of magnitude is common as the slip rate approaches values inferred for large earthquakes, though the mechanisms of weakening are debated 13,14 . The evolution of the coefficient of friction on a fault surface during and after an earthquake is time-dependent 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The plate interface at regions of great subduction zone earthquakes is often thought to consist of interfingering areas of contrasting frictional properties, which are ultimately controlling the feedback of pre-, co-and post-seismic processes (Kanamori and Brodsky, 2001). The asperity model (Lay and Kanamori, 1981) describes the subduction interface as consisting of asperities which build up stress inter-seismically and fail suddenly while the surrounding interface creeps.…”
Section: Implications For Mechanics Of the Subduction Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless the character of dynamics of seismic processes remains the subject of intense discussions because it is directly related to the problem of earthquake prediction. Critics of earthquake prediction (Kagan, 1994;Kagan, 1997;Geller, 1999;Kanamori and Brodsky, 2001), etc. regard seismic process as completely random, while its proponents consider it as complex and high-dimensional though not random (Main, 1997;Wyss, 1997;Chelidze and Matcharashvili, 2003;Knopoff, 1999), etc.…”
Section: Detection Of Nonrandom Nonlinear Structure In Geophysical Prmentioning
confidence: 99%