The Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill Patients

Abstract

Physicians have a specific responsibility toward patients who are hopelessly ill, dying, or in the end stages of an incurable disease. In a summary of current practices affecting the care of dying patients, we give particular emphasis to changes that have become commonplace since the early 1980s. Implementation of accepted policies has been deficient in certain areas, including the initiation of timely discussions with patients about dying, the solicitation and execution in advance of their directives for terminal care, the education of medical students and residents, and the formulation of institutional guidelines. The appropriate and, if necessary, aggressive use of pain-relieving substances is recommended, even when such use may result in shortened life. We emphasize the value of a sensitive approach to care--one that is adjusted continually to suit the changing needs of the patient as death approaches. Possible settings for death are reviewed, including the home, the hospital, the intensive care unit, and the nursing home. Finally, we consider the physician's response to the dying patient who is rational and desires suicide or euthanasia.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial distress at the end of life

“…The focus of this article is the management of psychosocial distress and psychiatric disorders in palliative care, especially depression, anxiety, and delirium, and the need to fully integrate their treatment into total care~Wanzer et al ., 1989;Twycross & Lichter, 1998!.…”

Bioethical Issues in Critical Care Nephrology

“…‘Physicians have the responsibility to consider timely discussion with patients about life-sustaining treatment. Such discussion and the resultant documentation should be considered a part of the minimal standard of acceptable care’ [4]. …”

The Double Effect of Pain Medication: Separating Myth from Reality

“…must learn that lack of a cure does not equate Although these commentators made a very with failure, a nurse must learn that the pres-forceful argument for the need to increase the ence of pain [in the dying patient] does not dosage of narcotics to whatever level is necessary to provide adequate pain relief, they still extended the myth that palliative care is often fatal because such action is ethical "even though the medication may contribute to the depression of respiration or blood pressure, the dulling of consciousness, or even death ..." [emphasis added]. 4 It is ofteri a nurse who must administer pain medication. In 1991, the American Nurses Association adopted a position statement on "Promotion of Comfort and Relief of Pain in Dying Patients":…”

“…According to many commentators, the 316 FOHR use of medication to treat pain and other symp-of the use of opioids to treat pain in cancer patoms in terminally ill patients may "hasten tients, and professional organizations have death," 3 "potentially" hasten death, 4 "actually published position papers recommending regspeed up the process of dying," 5 or "indirectly ular and adequate use of opioid analgesics for and unintentionally contribute to a patient's the pain of advanced cancer. 11 -12 death."…”