The physician’s experience of changing clinical practice: a struggle to unlearn

Abstract

BackgroundChanging clinical practice is a difficult process, best illustrated by the time lag between evidence and use in practice and the extensive use of low-value care. Existing models mostly focus on the barriers to learning and implementing new knowledge. Changing clinical practice, however, includes not only the learning of new practices but also unlearning old and outmoded knowledge. There exists sparse literature regarding the unlearning that takes place at a physician level. Our research objective was to elucidate the experience of trying to abandon an outmoded clinical practice and its relation to learning a new one.MethodsWe used a grounded theory-based qualitative approach to conduct our study. We conducted 30-min in-person interviews with 15 primary care physicians at the Cleveland VA Medical Center and its clinics. We used a semi-structured interview guide to standardize the interviews.ResultsOur two findings include (1) practice change disturbs the status quo equilibrium. Establishing a new equilibrium that incorporates the change may be a struggle; and (2) part of the struggle to establish a new equilibrium incorporating a practice change involves both the “evidence” itself and tensions between evidence and context.ConclusionsOur findings provide evidence-based support for many of the empirical unlearning models that have been adapted to healthcare. Our findings differ from these empirical models in that they refute the static and unidirectional nature of change that previous models imply. Rather, our findings suggest that clinical practice is in a constant flux of change; each instance of unlearning and learning is merely a punctuation mark in this spectrum of change. We suggest that physician unlearning models be modified to reflect the constantly changing nature of clinical practice and demonstrate that change is a multi-directional process.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0555-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Referral decisions and its predictors related to orthopaedic care. A retrospective study in a novel primary care setting

“…The novelty of the PC+ setting also requires specialists to deal with a new context and environment as well as their related expectations and understandings of what best practice is in this setting [44]. PC+ involves more than shifting outpatient hospital care to the primary setting; it is also about changing the mind-sets and behaviour of the involved health care professionals-both the GPs and medical specialists [45].…”

“…PC+ involves more than shifting outpatient hospital care to the primary setting; it is also about changing the mind-sets and behaviour of the involved health care professionals-both the GPs and medical specialists [45]. As described by Gupta et al [44], changing clinical practice is a complex process of learning and unlearning. The degree to which medical specialists succeed in changing their behavior according to the PC+ setting is questionable.…”

Quality improvement programme to improve compliance with initial respiratory support guideline at preterm birth

“…This requires not only the learning of new knowledge and skills, but also the 'unlearning' of old practices. 10 Other barriers to changing clinical practice that have been identified include: negative staff attitudes and beliefs, limited integration of guideline recommendations into organizational structures and processes and time and resource constraints. 11 Although strong leadership is required to effect change, a simple 'top down' approach is unlikely to be successful.…”

Text mining as a method for examining the alignment between educational outcomes and the workforce needs

“…Included in: ACPE standards 2016 [15] Included in: AACP core EPAs 2017 [14] 1. stem from various motivators and often presents opportunities to align efforts for progressive change. [18] Research on the origin of clinical practice change, however, rarely identifies education and academia as important components in the process. [19,20] This raises additional questions concerning what drives change within the profession -workforce needs or academic innovation?…”