2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001gl013170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physical mechanism of nitric oxide formation in simulated lightning

Abstract: Abstract.We report an experimental assessment of the contributions of the shockwave and the hot channel to the production of nitric oxide by simulated lightning. Lightning in the laboratory was simulated by a hot plasma generated with a pulsed Nd-YAG laser. The temporal evolution of electric breakdown in air at atmospheric pressure was studied from the nanosecond to the millisecond time scale by shadowgraphy and interferometry techniques. The shockwave front velocity was determined to be about 60 km s -x at 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the experimental data at 0% H 2 indicate that the formation of NO increases from ~1.9 × 10 15 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) = 0.98 to ~1.3 × 10 16 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) from 0.8 to 0.5 and then drastically drops to ~4.9 × 10 13 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) = 0.01. The expected T F for NO in shock‐heated air (N 2 /O 2 ) is 2300 K (Navarro‐González, Villagrán‐Muniz, et al, ). The predicted trend using this value is in good agreement with experiments at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) ≥ 0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the experimental data at 0% H 2 indicate that the formation of NO increases from ~1.9 × 10 15 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) = 0.98 to ~1.3 × 10 16 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) from 0.8 to 0.5 and then drastically drops to ~4.9 × 10 13 molecules/J at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) = 0.01. The expected T F for NO in shock‐heated air (N 2 /O 2 ) is 2300 K (Navarro‐González, Villagrán‐Muniz, et al, ). The predicted trend using this value is in good agreement with experiments at CO 2 /(CO 2 + N 2 ) ≥ 0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NO yield from cold discharge (temperature < 3000 K) in association with lightning or on cloud droplets is lower compared to hot channel lightning which was already postulated by Donohoe et al (1977). In the hot flash channel the NO yield maximizes at 4000 K (Bhetanabhotla et al, 1985;Martinez and Brandvold, 1996;Navarro-González et al, 2001). As shown by many theoretical and experimental studies, hot lightning strokes are a significant global source of NO x with a production rate of 15 (2-40) × 10 25 NO molecules per flash , and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The return stroke phase of a lightning flash was simulated in the laboratory by a hot plasma generated with a pulsed Nd‐YAG laser. This lightning simulation has been shown to be a good analog of natural lightning without introducing contamination from the electrodes [ Borucki et al , 1988] on the basis of its temperature and electron density [ Jebens et al , 1992], hydrodynamic evolution [ Sobral et al , 2000; Navarro‐González et al , 2001b], spectral properties [ Borucki et al , 1985], and its nitric oxide production yield [ Navarro‐González et al , 2001a; Navarro‐González et al , 2001b]. Furthermore, the energy dissipated per unit length in this laboratory simulated discharge was estimated to be ∼10 4 J m −1 [ Navarro‐González et al , 2001a], in close agreement with that from natural lightning [ Stark et al , 1996].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%