2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011.00476.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phylogeny and limits of Elateridae (Insecta, Coleoptera): is there a common tendency of click beetles to soft‐bodiedness and neoteny?

Abstract: Kundrata, R. & Bocak, L. (2011). The phylogeny and limits of Elateridae (Insecta, Coleoptera): is there a common tendency of click beetles to soft-bodiedness and neoteny? -Zoologica Scripta, 40, 364-378. Phylogenetic relationships in Elateroidea were investigated using partial 18S and 28S rDNA and rrnl and cox1 mtDNA sequences with special interest in the phylogeny of Elateridae and the position of soft-bodied lineages Drilidae and Omalisidae that had been classified as families in the cantharoid lineage of El… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
100
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
12
100
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of data for Buprestoidea remains low, which may explain the difficulty of placing them correctly. The current tree supports the monophyly of Elateroidea sensu Bocakova et al () and Kundrata & Bocak (), which includes the soft‐bodied families formerly grouped as Cantharoidea (Lawrence & Newton, ). The cantharoid families were never found as a monophylum, and Omethidae and Telegeusidae represent basal splits, whereas Cantharidae, Lampyridae and Lycidae are more closely related to Elateridae (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of data for Buprestoidea remains low, which may explain the difficulty of placing them correctly. The current tree supports the monophyly of Elateroidea sensu Bocakova et al () and Kundrata & Bocak (), which includes the soft‐bodied families formerly grouped as Cantharoidea (Lawrence & Newton, ). The cantharoid families were never found as a monophylum, and Omethidae and Telegeusidae represent basal splits, whereas Cantharidae, Lampyridae and Lycidae are more closely related to Elateridae (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…molecular systematics of particular beetle families (e.g. Robertson et al , ; Marvaldi et al , ), composition of local faunas (Pons et al , ; Monaghan et al , ), phylogeography (Ribera & Balke, ; Papadopoulou et al , ), DNA identification of immature stages (Ahrens et al , ), studies of adaptive traits (Kundrata & Bocak, ) and macroevolution (Gomez‐Zurita et al , ; McKenna & Farrell, ). The diverse aims of the original studies resulted in the erratic use of several different loci.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated the Negastriinae were the sister group to (Sagegami-Oba et al 2007; Oba 2007; Kundrata and Bocak 2011; and Kundrata et al 2016), or rendered paraphyletic by (Douglas 2011) the Cardiophorinae. Because of this, exemplars of the type species 15 of 30 world negastriine genera, and one non-type species, were included to further test cardiophorine monophyly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In beetles, extreme sexual dimorphism (e.g. larviform females) evolved multiple times from limited sexual dimorphism, resulting in convergent larviform female morphology of distantly related taxa (Bocakova et al ., ; Kundrata & Bocak, ). Transitions between limited and extreme sexual dimorphism have otherwise been little studied, and it is unclear if the pattern observed in elaterid beetles is also found in other groups of insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%