The Phosphorolytic Exoribonucleases Polynucleotide Phosphorylase and RNase PH Stabilize sRNAs and Facilitate Regulation of Their mRNA Targets

Abstract

Gene regulation by base pairing between small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) and their mRNA targets is an important mechanism that allows bacteria to maintain homeostasis and respond to dynamic environments. In Gram-negative bacteria, sRNA pairing and regulation are mediated by several RNA-binding proteins, including the sRNA chaperone Hfq and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). PNPase and its homolog RNase PH together represent the two 3= to 5= phosphorolytic exoribonucleases found in Escherichia coli; however, the role of RNase PH in sRNA regulation has not yet been explored and reported. Here, we have examined in detail how PNPase and RNase PH interact to support sRNA stability, activity, and base pairing in exponential and stationary growth conditions. Our results indicate that these proteins facilitate the stability and regulatory function of the sRNAs RyhB, CyaR, and MicA during exponential growth. PNPase further appears to contribute to pairing between RyhB and its mRNA targets. During stationary growth, each sRNA responded differently to the absence or presence of PNPase and RNase PH. Finally, our results suggest that PNPase and RNase PH stabilize only Hfq-bound sRNAs. Taken together, these results confirm and extend previous findings that PNPase participates in sRNA regulation and reveal that RNase PH serves a similar, albeit more limited, role as well. These proteins may, therefore, act to protect sRNAs from spurious degradation while also facilitating regulatory pairing with their targets. IMPORTANCEIn many bacteria, Hfq-dependent base-pairing sRNAs facilitate rapid changes in gene expression that are critical for maintaining homeostasis and responding to stress and environmental changes. While a role for Hfq in this process was identified more than 2 decades ago, the identity and function of the other proteins required for Hfq-dependent regulation by sRNAs have not been resolved. Here, we demonstrate that PNPase and RNase PH, the two phosphorolytic RNases in E. coli, stabilize sRNAs against premature degradation and, in the case of PNPase, also accelerate regulation by sRNA-mRNA pairings for certain sRNAs. These findings are the first to demonstrate that RNase PH influences and supports sRNA regulation and suggest shared and distinct roles for these phosphorolytic RNases in this process. Bacteria rapidly alter gene expression through small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) that act by base pairing with target mRNAs. Although classically identified as important players in bacterial stress response, sRNAs also play general roles regulating the genes involved in cell growth, nutrient acquisition, social behavior, and virulence (1, 2). sRNAs often act through translational repression, in which a given sRNA base pairs with the leader sequence of a target mRNA, obscuring the site that would otherwise form contacts with the ribosomal 30S subunit (3). This pairing can also lead to subsequent RNase E-mediated decay of the mRNA (4). In other cases, pairing with an mRNA leader sequence promotes gene expression by revea...

YeeJ is an inverse autotransporter from Escherichia coli that binds to peptidoglycan and promotes biofilm formation

“…Loss of PNPase leads to an increase in steady-state levels of mRNA 81 , 82 . It has been described that PNPase is involved in the degradation of lac mRNA, rnb mRNA and the RNA-OUT anti-sense molecule 62 , 83 . The yeeJ mRNA can thus be added to the list of mRNA degraded by PNPase.…”

A conserved stem of the Myxococcus xanthus sRNA Pxr controls sRNA accumulation and multicellular development

“…In E . coli , Hfq together with ribonucleases such as PNPase (polynucleotide phosphorylase) and RNasePH have been shown to stabilize some sRNAs and facilitate regulation of their targets 19 , 20 . In Pseudomonas putita , Hfq and Crc bind to CrcZ sRNA and protect it from degradation 21 .…”

RNA search engines empower the bacterial intranet

“…Both the S1 RNA-binding domain and the active site of PNPase play a role in binding sRNAs, although more determinants are likely to be involved. As to how PNPase would interact with sRNAs in the ternary complex, one possibility is that the enzyme starts degrading the 3′-end of a Hfq-associated sRNA, but is stalled at this end, forming a shielding Hfq–PNPase–sRNA complex [ 86 , 91 ].…”