Interspeech 2013 2013
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2013-708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phonological voicing contrast in Czech: an EPG study of phonated and whispered fricatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the lateral edges for [z] seemed to be more raised than for [s] (for FS5 and MS5). This could be related to the articulatory difference between the two segments (Stone et al 1992, Dagenais 1994, Liker et al 2012, Skarnitzl, Sturm & Machac 2013, Kochetov 2014): [z] has more anterior lingual-palatal contact than [s], and the anterior medial groove is narrower in [z]. The lateral edges of the tongue were not symmetrical during the articulation of high vowels.…”
Section: Comparing [Z] To [S] and To [I U 0]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lateral edges for [z] seemed to be more raised than for [s] (for FS5 and MS5). This could be related to the articulatory difference between the two segments (Stone et al 1992, Dagenais 1994, Liker et al 2012, Skarnitzl, Sturm & Machac 2013, Kochetov 2014): [z] has more anterior lingual-palatal contact than [s], and the anterior medial groove is narrower in [z]. The lateral edges of the tongue were not symmetrical during the articulation of high vowels.…”
Section: Comparing [Z] To [S] and To [I U 0]mentioning
confidence: 99%