Abstract:This article investigates the early phonological development of a trilingual child who is acquiring Spanish, Mandarin and Taiwanese simultaneously. By examining the natural speech data recorded between the age of 1;3 and 2;0, the article reports the age of emergence and stabilization of the vowels and consonants, speech accuracy and phonological error patterns in each language. The data show that by the age of two the child is able to produce most of the vowels in the three languages. However, there are cross-… Show more
“…The question of how this comparatively limited input affects trilingual children's language development—as investigated for bilinguals when compared to monolinguals—has also been addressed in the recent literature on early trilingual acquisition. Given that the relative amount of input was not directly reflected in the relative rate of acquisition in the three languages acquired by the child in their study, Yang and Zhu (2010) noted that the relationship between amount of input and rate of acquisition is clearly not a direct one. Furthermore, given that the child's development was very much like that of monolingual children with respect to age of acquisition, rate of acquisition, and error patterns, Yang and Zhu stressed that the inevitable reduction in input for trilingual children does necessarily lead to slower acquisition.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Multilingual First Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Montanari (2011) suggested that this may have been due to heightened sensitivity to language and its properties as a result of early multilingual exposure. In a study on the phonological development of a trilingual Spanish-Mandarin-Taiwanese child, Yang and Zhu (2010) also observed early differentiation as evidenced by different rates of acquisition in the three languages, sometimes for the same phoneme.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Multilingual First Language Acquisitionmentioning
Multilingual first language acquisition refers to the language development of children exposed to two or more languages from birth or shortly thereafter. Much of the research on this topic adopts a comparative approach. Bilinguals are thus compared with their monolingual peers, and trilinguals with both bilinguals and monolinguals; within children, comparisons are made between a child's two (or more) languages, and between different domains within those languages. The goal of such comparisons is to determine the extent to which language development proceeds along similar paths and/or at a similar rate across groups, languages, and domains, in order to elaborate upon the question of whether these different groups acquire language in the same way, and to evaluate how language development in multilingual settings is influenced by environmental factors. The answers to these questions have both theoretical and practical implications.The goal of this article is to discuss the results of some of this recent research on multilingual first language acquisition by reviewing (a) properties of the developing linguistic system in a variety of linguistic domains and (b) some of the characteristics of multilingual first language acquisition that have attracted attention over the past five years, including cross-linguistic influence, dominance, and input quantity/quality. Trilingual first language acquisition is covered in a dedicated section.
“…The question of how this comparatively limited input affects trilingual children's language development—as investigated for bilinguals when compared to monolinguals—has also been addressed in the recent literature on early trilingual acquisition. Given that the relative amount of input was not directly reflected in the relative rate of acquisition in the three languages acquired by the child in their study, Yang and Zhu (2010) noted that the relationship between amount of input and rate of acquisition is clearly not a direct one. Furthermore, given that the child's development was very much like that of monolingual children with respect to age of acquisition, rate of acquisition, and error patterns, Yang and Zhu stressed that the inevitable reduction in input for trilingual children does necessarily lead to slower acquisition.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Multilingual First Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Montanari (2011) suggested that this may have been due to heightened sensitivity to language and its properties as a result of early multilingual exposure. In a study on the phonological development of a trilingual Spanish-Mandarin-Taiwanese child, Yang and Zhu (2010) also observed early differentiation as evidenced by different rates of acquisition in the three languages, sometimes for the same phoneme.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Multilingual First Language Acquisitionmentioning
Multilingual first language acquisition refers to the language development of children exposed to two or more languages from birth or shortly thereafter. Much of the research on this topic adopts a comparative approach. Bilinguals are thus compared with their monolingual peers, and trilinguals with both bilinguals and monolinguals; within children, comparisons are made between a child's two (or more) languages, and between different domains within those languages. The goal of such comparisons is to determine the extent to which language development proceeds along similar paths and/or at a similar rate across groups, languages, and domains, in order to elaborate upon the question of whether these different groups acquire language in the same way, and to evaluate how language development in multilingual settings is influenced by environmental factors. The answers to these questions have both theoretical and practical implications.The goal of this article is to discuss the results of some of this recent research on multilingual first language acquisition by reviewing (a) properties of the developing linguistic system in a variety of linguistic domains and (b) some of the characteristics of multilingual first language acquisition that have attracted attention over the past five years, including cross-linguistic influence, dominance, and input quantity/quality. Trilingual first language acquisition is covered in a dedicated section.
“…Many other studies on bilingual phonological development have reported instances of interference (e.g. Fabiano & Goldstein, 2005; Yang & Hua, 2010). The overall incidence of interference in these studies is low, however.…”
This study provides the first systematic account of word-final cluster acquisition in bilingual children. To this end, 40 Welsh-English bilingual children differing in language dominance and age (2;6 to 5;0) participated in a picture-naming task in English and Welsh. The results revealed significant age and dominance effects on cluster acquisition, with greater overall accuracy on the English clusters. Interestingly, although the Welsh-dominant children outperformed the English-dominant ones on the Welsh clusters, they did not exhibit a concomitant lag on the English clusters. It is argued that this asymmetry is a direct reflection of the sociolinguistic situation in Wales with English as the majority language and Welsh the minority language. The study also revealed accelerated rates of acquisition for English clusters compared with age-matched monolinguals reported elsewhere (Templin, 1957), thereby supporting claims that bilingual contexts may have a facilitative effect on phonological acquisition
“…As such, children's ability to convey ideas through the printed word is highly emphasized as their success as literacy learners is contingent on their ability to read and write. As early as preschool, young children are building their repertoire of print knowledge and are using emergent writing in the form of drawing, scribbles, letter strings and invented spelling that reflect phonetic principles as part of their transition to conventional forms (Sulzby 1992;Al-Momani et al 2010;Arikan and Taraf 2010;Wedin 2010;Yang and Hua 2010;Al-Mansour and Al-Shorman 2011;Doyle 2013;Lucas et al 2020). In this study, the emergent literacy theoretical constructs are important considering that the participant children had had no previous contact with the foreign language, and as such, the constructs to bear in mind needed to consider how literacy develops both in the native and in the foreign language.…”
Section: Motivation For Developing Readingmentioning
This study focused on the characteristics of an action-research study concerning an English language reading and writing intervention program in a primary state school, located in northeast Portugal (low-Socio Economic Status setting), where four groups of children (n = 92) participated in the academic year 2019–2020, after the National strategy for foreign languages was launched. The longitudinal study carried out in the action-research methodology, where the teacher, syllabus designer and researcher was the main author, was set out with two main aims. The first was to tackle and to overcome the lack of teacher training for teaching English to young learners in Portuguese primary schools. The second was to prompt intervention, through the design and implementation of a suitable pedagogic approach for teaching English to young learners, in line with Content for Language and Integrated Learning (CLIL) principles, namely English Across the Curriculum, thus fostering the interrelationships between English language reading and writing skills. The findings of the action-research reading intervention program demonstrate that it is possible to overcome such barriers as pupils’ negative attitudes and counteract the damaging effects of poverty in foreign language literacy development by exposing them to children’s picturebooks/storybooks, thus fostering the overall literacy development. The key concepts explored in these books, being associated with primary key curriculum themes are an effective way to establish clear positive connections among English language reading and writing relationships. In addition, the current study also sheds light on how primary English language school teachers can design suitable pedagogic approaches to foster overall literacy development, thus advancing innovative teacher training opportunities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.