1951
DOI: 10.2307/1396845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Philosophy of Zen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In psychology, a state is distinguished from a trait and is characterised as being temporary and dynamic based on varying internal and external factors (Chaplin et al 1988). Psychologists, neuroscientists and philosophers have utilised different approaches to investigate experiential states, ranging from anxiety (Kendall et al 1976, May 1977, Heller et al 1997 to zen (Suzuki 1951, Berger 1962, Cahn & Polich 2006.…”
Section: Approaches To Studying Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In psychology, a state is distinguished from a trait and is characterised as being temporary and dynamic based on varying internal and external factors (Chaplin et al 1988). Psychologists, neuroscientists and philosophers have utilised different approaches to investigate experiential states, ranging from anxiety (Kendall et al 1976, May 1977, Heller et al 1997 to zen (Suzuki 1951, Berger 1962, Cahn & Polich 2006.…”
Section: Approaches To Studying Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may say that Chan Buddhism advocates a different form of presentism , in that it treats only the present mentation as real. D. T. Suzuki compares Chan's philosophy of time to “momentarism,” the view that everything is momentary, but he points out that momentarism “does not know what is meant by the absolute present” (Suzuki, 1951, p. 9). For Chan Buddhists, instantaneous enlightenment is “to be realized in [an absolute present]” (Suzuki, 1951, p. 10).…”
Section: The Philosophy Of Now In Chan Buddhismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. T. Suzuki compares Chan's philosophy of time to “momentarism,” the view that everything is momentary, but he points out that momentarism “does not know what is meant by the absolute present” (Suzuki, 1951, p. 9). For Chan Buddhists, instantaneous enlightenment is “to be realized in [an absolute present]” (Suzuki, 1951, p. 10). Once the thought passes, one moves on to the next idea.…”
Section: The Philosophy Of Now In Chan Buddhismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Buddha is not a mere word, but is “a reality you can touch every day” (p. 89). The reality that seems to be at issue here can only be experienced through “emersion” or “plunging” into it (see Suzuki, 1951, p. 7). It precedes as well as exceeds mere names.…”
Section: The Priority Of Understanding Over Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Gadamer (1965/2004) wrote, “Every experience worthy of the name thwarts an expectation” (p. 350). Instead, direct experience is “more direct than empirical observation” (Suzuki, 1951, p. 11). As Gadamer (1965/2004) wrote, “[Hermeneutical] experience stands in an ineluctable opposition to knowledge .…”
Section: The Priority Of Understanding Over Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%