2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203716045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Philosophy of Grammar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
81
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…As I pointed out to the reader above, many English common nouns which satisfy both the criteria for mass nouns and the criteria for count nouns exhibit a clear difference in construal correlated with the criteria the word satisfies, as noted by Jespersen (1924 pp. 198–200).…”
Section: Mass Count: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As I pointed out to the reader above, many English common nouns which satisfy both the criteria for mass nouns and the criteria for count nouns exhibit a clear difference in construal correlated with the criteria the word satisfies, as noted by Jespersen (1924 pp. 198–200).…”
Section: Mass Count: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The following are the well known distributional properties of mass nouns and count nouns in English. (See Jespersen 1924 pp. 198–200, where the distinction between the two kinds of nouns is made, and Bloomfield 1933 pp.…”
Section: Mass Count: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jespersen (1924) was the first to make a general distinction between "formulas" and "free expressions" which "pervades all parts of grammar." Bloomfield (1933) observed that "many forms lie on the border-line between bound forms and words, or between words and phrases" (p. 181).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cependant, les études qui portent sur le même sujet dans la langue française ont plutôt tendance à se concentrer sur 10. À noter deux exceptions dans la tradition anglo-saxonne : Jespersen (1924) et Persson (1989, qui tous les deux préfèrent une définition sémantique des noms collectifs, et qui admettent dans cette catégorie des entités inanimées. les caractéristiques sémantiques de ces expressions (voir entre autres Flaux 1998Flaux , 1999Flaux , 2001Lammert 2010 ;Lecolle 1998 ;Michaux 1992 ;Vilagines-Serra 2002).…”
Section: Facteurs Linguistiques Et Sociolinguistiquesunclassified