1941
DOI: 10.2307/370490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Philosophical Joads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full development of these connections might mitigate some of the tension between the perspective on workingclass political culture developed in this paper and recent work on the marginalization of women and racial minorities. These agrarian themes also link this essay to previous contributions in Steinbeck scholarship, notably papers by Carpenter (1941) and Eisinger (1947). Both argued for an agrarian reading of The Grapes of Wrath, though the version of agrarianism they describe would not have obvious links to contemporary feminist or postcolonial thought.…”
Section: Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A full development of these connections might mitigate some of the tension between the perspective on workingclass political culture developed in this paper and recent work on the marginalization of women and racial minorities. These agrarian themes also link this essay to previous contributions in Steinbeck scholarship, notably papers by Carpenter (1941) and Eisinger (1947). Both argued for an agrarian reading of The Grapes of Wrath, though the version of agrarianism they describe would not have obvious links to contemporary feminist or postcolonial thought.…”
Section: Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…While the novel may be read as an example of Emersonian idealism in the midst of literary naturalism, a style that, as Charles Walcutt has described one defining stream of naturalism, “nourishes idealism, progressivism, and social radicalism,” Steinbeck's anti‐separatist agenda is pursued in decidedly biological terms (vii). Of literary interpreters, Frederic I. Carpenter comes close to identifying the sense of contrast between organic self‐organization, Kauffman's second source of order, and the socialistic path of organization Jim Casy hopes to take. In an examination of the old “I” becoming the new “we,” Carpenter sees a process whereby the “mutually repellent particles of individualism begin to cohere” (319).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%