Explicit cues associated with food consumption when hunger prevails will enhance eating when they are subsequently presented under conditions of satiety. Here we examined whether contextual conditioned stimuli (CSs) paired with consumption of food pellets while rats were food-deprived would enhance consumption of this food in rats that were not food-deprived. The conditioning context enhanced rats' consumption of the training food, but it did not change their consumption of the familiar, lab chow. These results show that the contextual CSs, like discrete cues, could modulate food consumption in a CS-potentiated eating paradigm. Furthermore, the data suggest that CSpotentiation of eating does not induce a general motivation to eat, akin to hunger, but instead more likely produces a more specific motivational state, akin to craving. Keywords appetite; conditioning; context; craving; eating; environment; obesity; overeating Eating is controlled not only by metabolic signals but also by a number of cues that are not related to energy balance [1]. For example, an auditory or visual conditioned stimulus (CS) that is paired with a food unconditioned stimulus (US) when rats are food-deprived will stimulate eating when they are food-sated [2]. A number of recent studies identified components of brain circuitry critical to the occurrence of this cue-potentiated eating [3][4][5][6][7]. However, those studies used a single training protocol, and only evaluated consumption of the food used as the US. In the experiment reported here, we extended the cue-potentiated eating procedure by using contextual cues to signal food availability, and by testing the ability of those cues to potentiate consumption of a familiar food other than the training food. This test procedure allowed us to determine if food-related cues enhance eating by inducing general motivation to consume any food, akin to hunger, or by stimulating consumption of the training food specifically, akin to appetite or craving. We first trained food-deprived rats to consume food pellets in the conditioning context. Rats in a control group were exposed to that context, but received the food pellets in their home cages. All rats were then sated, by ad libitum access to lab chow, and food consumption was tested in the conditioning context. The rats that were previously fed food pellets in the conditioning context when hungry consumed more of those same food pellets during tests compared to the control rats that were never fed in that context. By contrast, when presented with familiar, lab chow, in the conditioning context, all rats consumed similar, small amounts. Thus, our results suggest the mechanism that mediates cueCorrespondence should be addressed