2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.hna.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phase field method for geometric moving interfaces and their numerical approximations

Abstract: This chapter surveys recent numerical advances in the phase field method for geometric surface evolution and related geometric nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). Instead of describing technical details of various numerical methods and their analyses, the chapter presents a holistic overview about the main ideas of phase field modeling, its mathematical foundation, and relationships between the phase field formalism and other mathematical formalisms for geometric moving interface problems, as well… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 427 publications
(667 reference statements)
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional phase field (diffuse interface) models take on a 50 M. D'Elia, Q. Du, C. Glusa, M. Gunzburger, X. Tian and Z. Zhou free energy of the type(Du and Feng 2020)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional phase field (diffuse interface) models take on a 50 M. D'Elia, Q. Du, C. Glusa, M. Gunzburger, X. Tian and Z. Zhou free energy of the type(Du and Feng 2020)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For completeness, let us mention that there are also interface capturing approaches that avoid the need P. Pozzi & B. Stinner to look after the mesh quality [7,23,28,5,17]. Such approaches comprise phase field models and level set methods, for overviews we refer to [11,4,13,27].…”
Section: P Pozzi and B Stinnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, numerical level set methods occasionally require reinitialisation of the level set function for accurate simulations [27,28], which is not the case for numerical phase field methods. We refer to [39] for a recent review of computational methods for phase field equations, where also the relation to level set approaches is discussed.…”
Section: Interface Capturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to make simulations cheaper is using finite element methods with adaptive refinement as discussed in [39]. Figure 3C gives an impression of a mesh that is refined only in the interfacial layer for an ellipsoidal droplet in 2D.…”
Section: Interface Capturingmentioning
confidence: 99%