1994
DOI: 10.1126/science.265.5176.1202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Phase Boundary Between α- and β-Mg 2 SiO 4 Determined by in Situ X-ray Observation

Abstract: The stability of Mg(2)SiO(4), a major constituent in the Earth's mantle, has been investigated experimentally by in situ observation with synchrotron radiation. A cubic-type high-pressure apparatus equipped with sintered diamond anvils has been used over pressures of 11 to 15 gigapascals and temperatures of 800 degrees to 1600 degrees C. The phase stability of alpha-Mg(2)SiO(4) and beta-Mg(2)SiO(4) was determined by taking account of the kinetic behavior of transition. The phase boundary between alpha-Mg(2)SiO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
79
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly the pressure and temperature range of thermodynamic stability of wadsleyite occurred only after the third reverberation, thus reducing growth times to Ϸ350 ns, which then implies even faster growth rates. Because no other high-pressure phase has been clearly identified in our experiment, it is also possible that the observed wadsleyite crystallized from shock-induced melt or transformation of higher-pressure polymorphs such as ringwoodite upon release from the shock state as the pressures decreased down to the 14-to 16-GPa range (29). In this range of pressure, temperature may have been too low to induce complete back-transformation, while any record of higherpressure polymorphs may have been lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Possibly the pressure and temperature range of thermodynamic stability of wadsleyite occurred only after the third reverberation, thus reducing growth times to Ϸ350 ns, which then implies even faster growth rates. Because no other high-pressure phase has been clearly identified in our experiment, it is also possible that the observed wadsleyite crystallized from shock-induced melt or transformation of higher-pressure polymorphs such as ringwoodite upon release from the shock state as the pressures decreased down to the 14-to 16-GPa range (29). In this range of pressure, temperature may have been too low to induce complete back-transformation, while any record of higherpressure polymorphs may have been lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relationship between load and sample pressure was calibrated by using the following phase transformations for the 18 mm assembly: Bi (2.55 and 7.7 GPa) at room temperature and SiO 2 (quartzcoesite) at 3.2 GPa and 1200°C (Akaogi et al, 1995). Furthermore, it was calibrated by using the following phase transformations for the 14 mm assembly: Bi and ZnTe (6, 9.6, and 12 GPa) at room temperature (Kusaba et al, 1993), SiO 2 (coesite-stishovite) at 9.4 GPa and 1300°C (Zhang et al, 1996), and Mg 2 SiO 4 (olivine-wadsleyite) at 14.0-15.1 GPa and 1300-1600°C (Morishima et al, 1994). In each experiment, pressure was applied first.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 14/8-mm assembly (octahedron length/truncation length) was used for each experiment, consisting of a MgO-based octahedral pressure medium with a stepped graphite heater, MgO and/or BN spacers and pyrophyllite gaskets. Dry experiments in the system MgO-SiO 2 are -among others-the base of the P calibration of the multi-anvil experiments where the α−β transition curve of the study of Morishima et al (1994) has been taken as reference (13.6 GPa -1,200°C). In some experiments, the pressure was calculated using the (Mg,Fe) 2 SiO 4 phase relations (see Frost and Dolejs, 2007).…”
Section: Multi-anvil Synthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%