2000
DOI: 10.3317/jraas.2000.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pharmacological potency of various AT1 antagonists assessed by Schild regression technique in man

Abstract: Consistent with results from experimental pharmacology, candesartan cilexetil displayed the highest pharmacological potency (i.e. antagonistic activity per mg substance) of the AIIAs tested. Apparent K(i)-doses at 24 hours were within the dose range recommended for clinical use in patients with hypertension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antagonism of AT1R by various ARBs has also been tested in vivo in humans, mostly healthy volunteers, and, similar to the above animal studies, this was largely done for ANGinduced blood pressure elevations. Following the original study with losartan (Christen et al, 1991), such studies have been performed with candesartan (Delacretaz et al, 1995;Ogihara et al, 1995;Belz et al, 1997Belz et al, , 2000Malerczyk et al, 1998;Fuchs et al, 2000;Gleiter et al, 2004), irbesartan (Belz et al, 1999Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999), losartan (Munafo et al, 1992;Belz et al, 1997Belz et al, , 1999Belz et al, , 2000Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999;Fuchs et al, 2000;Gleiter et al, 2004), telmisartan Stangier et al, 2001), and valsartan (Müller et al, 1994;Morgan et al, 1997;Belz et al, 1999Belz et al, , 2000Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999).…”
Section: Antagonism In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antagonism of AT1R by various ARBs has also been tested in vivo in humans, mostly healthy volunteers, and, similar to the above animal studies, this was largely done for ANGinduced blood pressure elevations. Following the original study with losartan (Christen et al, 1991), such studies have been performed with candesartan (Delacretaz et al, 1995;Ogihara et al, 1995;Belz et al, 1997Belz et al, , 2000Malerczyk et al, 1998;Fuchs et al, 2000;Gleiter et al, 2004), irbesartan (Belz et al, 1999Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999), losartan (Munafo et al, 1992;Belz et al, 1997Belz et al, , 1999Belz et al, , 2000Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999;Fuchs et al, 2000;Gleiter et al, 2004), telmisartan Stangier et al, 2001), and valsartan (Müller et al, 1994;Morgan et al, 1997;Belz et al, 1999Belz et al, , 2000Maillard et al, 1999;Mazzolai et al, 1999).…”
Section: Antagonism In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the half-maximal effect is obtained with 5 mg candesartan and 60 mg irbesartan. As previously mentioned, the antagonistic properties of most available AT 1 receptor antagonists have been shown clear parallels in Schild plots, though the substances differed in their potency and time kinetics [21].…”
Section: Dose-related Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although serum trough levels of candesartan at a dose of 8 mg day 21 increased with repeated administration, and the half-life was higher in patients with impaired renal function, it did not lead to drug accumulation [15]. At doses exceeding 12 mg day 21 , the elimination of candesartan was delayed in patients with severe renal dysfunction, leading to possible accumulation [3].…”
Section: Metabolism and Excretionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted above, the patients included in this trial tend to be more symptomatic, in terms of NYHA class, than those in ValHeFT, and a higher proportion are receiving ␤-blockers or spironolactone. Furthermore, candesartan has been shown to provide more complete and prolonged blockade of the renin-angiotensin system than valsartan and other AT 1 -receptor blockers, [19][20][21] and thus may be expected to produce a greater clinical effect than that achieved with valsartan in Val-HeFT.…”
Section: Continuing Trials With At 1 -Receptor Blockers In Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%