1999
DOI: 10.1007/s101100050036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phantom of the matrix: Inverting the case on closure in Cole's model

Abstract: In Closing the Case on Closure in Cole's Model Randall Jackson and Moss Madden critique my solution to the time-lagged regional input-output model. My rebuttal demonstrates that they: i) interpret my model incorrectly, ii) are inconsistent in their own specification, and iii) make inapplicable numerical comparisons between short-and long-term solutions. I show also iv) the correct solution to the totally closed model is neither trivial, nor singular, and v) this resolves the apparent paradox of infinite multip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But trying to prove that his opponents are wrong all the way, he continues to argue that there are no such problems in the fully closed, whole world case either. He does that in Table 1 (Cole, 1999). There, he pre-multiplies a "zero net exogenous demand" vector with an extended Leontief-inverse with cells up in the millions.…”
Section: Can Interregional Feedbacks Be Modelled Without a Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But trying to prove that his opponents are wrong all the way, he continues to argue that there are no such problems in the fully closed, whole world case either. He does that in Table 1 (Cole, 1999). There, he pre-multiplies a "zero net exogenous demand" vector with an extended Leontief-inverse with cells up in the millions.…”
Section: Can Interregional Feedbacks Be Modelled Without a Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show this specification to be internally inconsistent and conclude with some comments on "widespread access to spread-sheets" and "little or no understanding of the underlying logic" (p. 426). Cole (1999) responds with another explanation of his approach, now using a 2-sector summary with a single region versus the RoW, again making use of the round-by-round interpretation of the Leontief-inverse and of spread-sheet demonstrations to prove his points. Lengthy discussions of internal consistency, exogenous versus endogenous items in a fully closed model, and the paradox of infinite multipliers in a finite world are part of the argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of this related work on IO, by this author, also has led to a virulent debate as to why the world economy -as a closed system -does not explode or collapse in response the smallest disturbance![29] This storm in a teacup is reminiscent of the debate between the Sussex and MIT authors about backcasting with the Limits models. Again, world modeling becomes the place where mathematics, economics, history, physics, religion, and philosophy intersect-a fascinating launch pad for a class on Futures Studies and Social Issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Jackson et al (1997) and Jackson and Madden (1999) pointed out some problems in Cole's closure, regarding to inconsistencies in the model. These arguments were refuted in two subsequent articles: Cole (1997Cole ( , 1999. Later on, Oosterhaven (2000) summarised the debate, discussed the main aspects arisen from the academic problem and opened the remaining points for further research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%