2010
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2010.171.2089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perverse filtration and the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
81
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(4)) are Hodge substructures of the natural Hodge structure on H * (X). The geometric description of the perverse filtration in [55] (see §2.4) implies that this fact holds for every algebraic map, proper or not, to a quasi projective variety, and the proof in [55] is independent of the decomposition theorem. It follows that the geometric description of the perverse filtration in [55] can therefore be used to yield a considerable simplification of the line of reasoning in [51] for it endows, at the outset, the perverse cohomology groups H a b (X) with a natural Hodge structure, compatible with the primitive Lefschetz decompositions stemming from (18), and with respect to which the cup product maps L : H * (Y, P i ) → H * +2 (Y, P i ) and η : P k H * (X) → P k−2 H * +2 (X) are Hodge maps of type (1, 1).…”
Section: Weight Miracle): If Z ⊆ U ⊆ X Are Inclusions With X a Nonsinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(4)) are Hodge substructures of the natural Hodge structure on H * (X). The geometric description of the perverse filtration in [55] (see §2.4) implies that this fact holds for every algebraic map, proper or not, to a quasi projective variety, and the proof in [55] is independent of the decomposition theorem. It follows that the geometric description of the perverse filtration in [55] can therefore be used to yield a considerable simplification of the line of reasoning in [51] for it endows, at the outset, the perverse cohomology groups H a b (X) with a natural Hodge structure, compatible with the primitive Lefschetz decompositions stemming from (18), and with respect to which the cup product maps L : H * (Y, P i ) → H * +2 (Y, P i ) and η : P k H * (X) → P k−2 H * +2 (X) are Hodge maps of type (1, 1).…”
Section: Weight Miracle): If Z ⊆ U ⊆ X Are Inclusions With X a Nonsinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The extension to the quasi projective context of the results in [51,54] is contained in [45], which builds on [55]. Since these papers deal with non compact varieties, the statements involve mixed Hodge structures.…”
Section: A Proof Via Classical Hodge Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, the results for projective varieties and the maps between them (in this case, all Hodge structures are pure) are found in [51,54] and the extension to quasi-projective varieties and the proper maps between them is found in [45], which builds heavily on [55].…”
Section: A Few Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [55], we give a geometric description of the perverse filtration on the cohomology and on the cohomology with compact supports of a constructible complex on a quasi-projective variety. The paper [45] gives an alternative proof with the applications to mixed Hodge theory mentioned in §1.9; the paper [46] proves similar results for the standard filtration on cohomology with compact supports.…”
Section: Proposition 236 (Composition Series) Let P ∈ P Y There mentioning
confidence: 99%