The perspective of gender on the Ebola virus using a risk management and population health framework: a scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundIn the three decades since the first reported case of Ebola virus, most known index cases have been consistently traced to the hunting of “bush meat”, and women have consistently recorded relatively high fatality rates in most catastrophic outbreaks. This paper discusses Ebola-related risk factors, which constantly interact with cultural values, and provides an insight into the link between gender and the risk of contracting infectious diseases, using Ebola virus as an example within Africa.MethodA comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, Ovid Medline and Global Health CABI databases as well as CAB Abstracts, including gray literature. We used a descriptive and sex- and gender-based analysis to revisit previous studies on Ebola outbreaks since 1976 to 2014, and disaggregated the cases and fatality rates according to gender and the sources of known index cases based on available data.ResultsIn total, approximately 1530 people died in all previous Ebola outbreaks from 1976 to 2012 compared with over 11,310 deaths from the 2014 outbreak. Women’s increased exposure can be attributed to time spent at home and their responsibility for caring for the sick, while men’s increased vulnerability to the virus can be attributed to their responsibility for caring for livestock and to time spent away from home, as most known sources of the index cases have been infected in the process of hunting. We present a conceptual model of a circle of interacting risk factors for Ebola in the African context.ConclusionThere is currently no evidence related to biological differences in female or male sex that increases Ebola virus transmission and vulnerability; rather, there are differences in the level of exposure between men and women. Gender is therefore an important risk factor to consider in the design of health programs. Building the capacity for effective risk communication is a worthwhile investment in public and global health for future emergency responses.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-017-0346-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Forty-two years of responding to Ebola virus outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review

“…A surveillance system is essential in the control measures required to reduce morbidity and mortality caused by EVD. Control strategies during an Ebola outbreak include proactive case detection, contact tracing and management, safe and dignified burials, and prevention of new infections 27 28…”

Intersectionality as a lens to the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for sexual and reproductive health in development and humanitarian contexts

“…The most striking example of this relates to the Ebola outbreak, where women were more exposed to the virus due to their role in caregiving for family members, and due to their traditional involvement in funeral rites which exposed them to bodies which had been infected with Ebola. [7] Since the Ebola outbreak, agencies have been focusing on understanding the gendered dimensions of outbreaks, including for the coronavirus. This has resulted in a number of resources, gender analyses and guidelines, designed to ensure gender considerations are embedded in COVID-19 responses within development and humanitarian settings.…”

Gender norms and mass deworming program access in Comé, Benin: A qualitative assessment of gender-associated opportunities and challenges to achieving high mass drug administration coverage

“…Furthermore, many of the men perceived women to be responsible for family hygiene and therefore to blame if they or their children become infected. Previous studies compare how typical gender roles, such as preparing food, may perpetuate perceived differences in disease risk between men and women [30,31]. The different responses from men and women while discussing mothers' role in STH prevention and treatment highlighted clear inequitable gender roles that may need to be addressed to achieve high treatment coverage.…”