2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02813870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The personality assessment inventory as a selection device for law enforcement personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, important strides have been made in this literature, including the examination of police misconduct utilizing several criminological theories, such as social learning theory (Chappell & Piquero, 2004), strain theory (Arter, 2007), control balance theory (Hickman, Piquero, Lawton, & Greene, 2001), social disorganization theory (Kane, 2002), deterrence theory (Pogarsky & Piquero, 2004), and self-control theory (Donner & Jennings, 2014). Although prior research has assessed personality correlates of police misconduct (e.g., Girodo, 1991; Weiss, Rostow, Davis, & DeCoster-Martin, 2004), and Pogarsky and Piquero (2004) used one dimension (i.e., impulsivity) of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) self-control concept to examine police misbehavior, only one study to date has directly examined the effect of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory on police deviance. Donner and Jennings (2014) utilized data from a sample of 1,935 Philadelphia police officers and found that low self-control is significantly related to officer misconduct.…”
Section: Police Misconductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, important strides have been made in this literature, including the examination of police misconduct utilizing several criminological theories, such as social learning theory (Chappell & Piquero, 2004), strain theory (Arter, 2007), control balance theory (Hickman, Piquero, Lawton, & Greene, 2001), social disorganization theory (Kane, 2002), deterrence theory (Pogarsky & Piquero, 2004), and self-control theory (Donner & Jennings, 2014). Although prior research has assessed personality correlates of police misconduct (e.g., Girodo, 1991; Weiss, Rostow, Davis, & DeCoster-Martin, 2004), and Pogarsky and Piquero (2004) used one dimension (i.e., impulsivity) of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) self-control concept to examine police misbehavior, only one study to date has directly examined the effect of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory on police deviance. Donner and Jennings (2014) utilized data from a sample of 1,935 Philadelphia police officers and found that low self-control is significantly related to officer misconduct.…”
Section: Police Misconductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, for example, includes several items that tap into Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) dimensions of low self-control (e.g., impulsivity, temper, and thrill-seeking). Moreover, prior studies have demonstrated that these behavioral and personality factors are related to negative police behavior, such as misconduct (e.g., Weiss, Rostow, Davis, & DeCoster-Martin, 2004). Of course, while events like divorce, debt, and car accidents are common to members of the general public—and many people experiencing these events are not necessarily impulsive or easily provoked—the accumulation of these analogous behaviors may serve to signal to police administrators that specific applicants may warrant additional screening or training in the academy and for monitoring as an officer as part of a larger early-warning detection system (Palmiotto, 2001; Walker & Alpert, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; 16-PF; Craig, 2005;Dantzker & Freeberg, 2003;Jacobs, Cushenbery, & Grabarek, 2011;Kitaeff, 2010;Lee, 2006;Personnel Selection, 2005;Sanders, 2003;Weiss, Rostow, Davis, & DeCoster-Martin, 2004). It appears the most often cited protocols being used are the MMPI-II, CPI, and the IPI with the MMPI being identified as the most common choice (Dantzker, 2007(Dantzker, , 2010Kitaeff, 2010;Dantzker & McCoy, 2006).…”
Section: What Protocol To Use?mentioning
confidence: 98%