1996
DOI: 10.1515/9783110819205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During the same period, press reports and industry warnings about widespread facility closures among nursing homes in the United States caused widespread anxiety among consumer advocates, state officials and policy makers (Kitchener et al 2002). Similar concerns have been expressed in Australia in response to the introduction of care standards (Howe 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…During the same period, press reports and industry warnings about widespread facility closures among nursing homes in the United States caused widespread anxiety among consumer advocates, state officials and policy makers (Kitchener et al 2002). Similar concerns have been expressed in Australia in response to the introduction of care standards (Howe 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Germanic and Romance examples can provide us with evidences of this social factor. In the case of German, the emergence of Eure Gnaden ('your graces') and later Sie was prompted in the eastern part of the Elba river because of a quite conservative and rural society (Hickey 2003;Howe 1996). It was later generalised to all German-speaking areas.…”
Section: Socio-pragmatic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was later generalised to all German-speaking areas. In the case of English, Raumolin-Brunberg (2005) claims that the extension of you was the result of two facts: firstly, the phonetic stress of the object pronoun in comparison to the lack of stress of ye (nominative); secondly, the generalisation in London upper classes of you in detriment of thou as a way to differentiate themselves from the rest of the social spectrum (notice that thou is still attested in rural areas of north-eastern England, Evans 1969;Howe 1996). The universalisation of you to the rest of the society is due to the attempt of middle classes to appear to be like prestigious upper classes from London.…”
Section: Socio-pragmatic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, personal pronouns are far more frequent than full noun phrases (cf. Howe, 1996). Second, most matrix predicates in whquestions are mental verbs (verbs like 'think' and 'hope').…”
Section: Type Of Matrix Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%