2018
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.171151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Personal Genome Project Canada: findings from whole genome sequences of the inaugural 56 participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Across all five samples, 89-96% of the genome was covered at least 20× (quality metrics in Table S4). We interpreted likely pathogenic variants, loss-of-function constraint gene variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) as previously described (Reuter et al, 2018) (Supp. Excel files).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across all five samples, 89-96% of the genome was covered at least 20× (quality metrics in Table S4). We interpreted likely pathogenic variants, loss-of-function constraint gene variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) as previously described (Reuter et al, 2018) (Supp. Excel files).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from their versatility, the main advantage of these blood-derived footprint-free lines is the clinical annotation of potentially disease-associated variants that may impact cellular phenotypes. Variant analysis in the PGPC participants’ blood had revealed heterozygous variants of unknown significance in all individuals (Reuter et al, 2018). This observation suggests that it may not be possible to isolate universal control lines and reinforces the importance for WGS in characterizing control lines, especially as clinical annotation gains precision with ongoing variant discoveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-coding variants and structural variants, which can be detected using whole genome data (47), were not studied. For rare non-coding variants, access to large samples of whole genome data may offer interesting opportunities, especially if analyzing better understood functional elements like promoters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several screening programs are initiating genomic sequencing for healthy or unselected populations, irrespective of health status or family history. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Amongst these population screening programs there is consensus to return genomic results which are medically significant however there is less concordance regarding which genes fall into this category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%