1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1536(66)80057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The persistence of Colletotrichum coccodes and Mycosphaerella ligulicola in soil, with special reference to sclerotia and conidia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and are believed to serve as survival structures (29,41). The tomato root and fruit rot pathogen C. coccodes forms MS freely in the soil that may survive and remain infective for several years (7,12). There are also reports of C. truncatum forming MS on lentil and soybean plants (29,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and are believed to serve as survival structures (29,41). The tomato root and fruit rot pathogen C. coccodes forms MS freely in the soil that may survive and remain infective for several years (7,12). There are also reports of C. truncatum forming MS on lentil and soybean plants (29,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide distribution of C. coccodes in South African potato soils indicates that black dot originates mainly from soilborne inoculum throughout the country. Considering that C. coccodes can survive saprophytically for more than a year in soil (Blakeman & Hornby, 1966;Farley, 1976), it is clear that planting diseasefree seed, or treating seed with fungicides would not decrease the disease in black dot-infested fields unless the soil is also managed to suppress or eliminate the pathogen. This was corroborated in the present investigation by the failure of prochloraz to control disease in unfumigated soil, notwithstanding its pronounced inhibitory effect on infection in fumigated plots, as well as in soil not previously SEED-AND SOILBORNE COLLETOTRICHUM COCCODES AND BLACK DOT planted to potatoes (Denner et al, 1996).…”
Section: -Il S E E D -A N D S O I L B O R N E C O L L E T O T R I Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hughes has a worldwide distribution (Barkdoll & Davis, 1992) and is particularly prevalent in South Africa due to the susceptibility of local cultivars (Denner & Marais, 1989). Infection of tubers by C. coccodes originates primarily from inoculum on seed (Jellis & Taylor, 1974), or from microsclerotia occurring free or on colonised plant debris in soil (Blakeman & Hornby, 1966). According to Read & Hide (1988) the incidence of black dot on the progeny of disease-free tubers increased by augmenting C. coccodesinfested soil with laboratory-cultured inoculum of the pathogen, while Read (1993) indicated that seed infection, unless severe, is only important early in the season when soil inoculum level is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since C. coccodes can survive on debris (Blakeman & Hornby, 1966), it was anticipated that displacement of inoculum from the infection target area would reduce disease in the ensuing potato crop. Considering the success achieved with deep (60 cm) mouldboard ploughing against crater disease of wheat, caused by R. solani on the Springbok Flats in South Africa (Opperman & Barnard, 1992), and the inefficiency of 30 cm deep ploughing against this pathogen on potatoes (Gudmested et al, 1978;Leach et al, 1993), it was expected that deeper tillage would provide a greater reduction in disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hughes (Mordue, 1967;Jellis & Taylor, 1977) necessitate appropriate control measures. C. coccodes can survive for long periods in soil on plant debris or as free microsclerotia in the absence of a susceptible host (Blakeman & Hornby, 1966) and treatment therefore has to be directed at eliminating or reducing inoculum in soil. Several soil fumigants have been screened for this purpose (Stevenson et al, 1976: Read & Hide, 1995, but only methyl bromide provided effective control (Slusarski, 1989;Denner et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%