2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Persian version of satisfaction assessment module of Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the test–retest reliability in previous studies was examined, ICC values were found to be 0.82 and 0.67 for the CSD module and 0.77 and 0.90 for the CSS module. 1,16 In this study, the ICC values were found to be higher, demonstrating that the Turkish versions of the OPUS CSD and CSS modules have high reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the test–retest reliability in previous studies was examined, ICC values were found to be 0.82 and 0.67 for the CSD module and 0.77 and 0.90 for the CSS module. 1,16 In this study, the ICC values were found to be higher, demonstrating that the Turkish versions of the OPUS CSD and CSS modules have high reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…3 The OPUS satisfaction module is frequently used to evaluate the satisfaction of P&O users, and studies of the scale in different language versions, such as Persian, Italian, Swedish, and Arabic, have been performed with acceptable psychometric properties. 1,2,15,16 There are validated Turkish versions of scales for the assessment of lower limb prosthesis satisfaction. 17 However, there is no valid scale for assessing orthotic satisfaction and P&O service satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of studies have evaluated the measurement properties of non-English (translated) versions of the 11-item OPUS-CSD, 1925 with some recommending removal of several items. 22 Additional research on the structural validity of the OPUS-CSD is needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the VAS assessment, participants marked a point on the horizontal line that represents the amount of satisfaction perception for the items. The VAS score can be determined by recording the reading from the left end of the line to the marking point, ranging from 0 to 100 32 . In this section, satisfaction assessment was evaluated from four aspects, namely overall satisfaction, school organisation and management, overall performance of faculty advisors and overall performance of dental undergraduates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%