2018
DOI: 10.1112/plms.12137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The periplectic Brauer algebra

Abstract: We study the periplectic Brauer algebra introduced by Moon in the study of invariant theory for periplectic Lie superalgebras. We determine when the algebra is quasi‐hereditary, when it admits a quasi‐hereditary 1‐cover and, for fields of characteristic zero, describes the block decomposition. To achieve this, we also develop theories of Jucys–Murphy elements, Bratteli diagrams, Murphy bases, obtain a Humphreys‐BGG reciprocity relation and determine some decomposition multiplicities of cell modules. As an appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [B+9], we will use the "fake Casimir element" Ω to decompose the functor − ⊗ V . This operator Ω also appeared in [Co2,Section 8.4] and [CP,Section 2]. For the explicit realisation of Ω ∈ g ⊗ gl(n|n), we refer to [B+9,Section 4.1].…”
Section: Category O For the Periplectic Lie Superalgebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following [B+9], we will use the "fake Casimir element" Ω to decompose the functor − ⊗ V . This operator Ω also appeared in [Co2,Section 8.4] and [CP,Section 2]. For the explicit realisation of Ω ∈ g ⊗ gl(n|n), we refer to [B+9,Section 4.1].…”
Section: Category O For the Periplectic Lie Superalgebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the block decomposition of the category of finite dimensional modules and of category O is not controlled by the combination of the centre and the root lattice. For finite dimensional modules, the block decomposition was recently obtained independently in [B+9] and [Co2], with one direction already proved earlier in [Ch]. To determine the blocks in O we establish a BGG reciprocity result and exploit the technique in [B+9] of decomposing the translation functors using a 'fake Casimir operator'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 8.3 it is enough to consider the case when λ is obtained from µ by removing two boxes in the same row. For a field K of characteristic zero, we have [Cou18,Proposition 7.2.6] [W K n (λ) : L K n (µ)] = 1. This implies that there exists a submodule M of W K n (λ) such that Hom A K n (W K n (µ), W K n (λ)/M ) = 0.…”
Section: Blocks In Characteristic P >mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast the representation theory of the periplectic Brauer algebra remained unstudied until quite recently. In particular the simple modules have been classified for arbitrary characteristic [KT17] and for characteristic zero (or large characteristic) a classification of the blocks [Cou18] and a complete description of the decomposition multiplicities [CE18] have been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows one to apply the Cherednik [13] and Okounkov-Vershik [10], [33] approaches in this context. First steps in this direction were already successfully taken in [3] and [14] from different perspectives to determine the blocks and decomposition numbers in the category of finite dimensional representations of p(n) and of the Brauer superalgebra, and further developed in [15]. A thorough treatment of the corresponding category O is so far missing and will be deferred to subsequent work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%