2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41570-020-0195-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The periodic table and the physics that drives it

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 284 publications
(235 reference statements)
4
62
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as a classification system is beneficial to economy of description , to structuring knowledge [italics added] and to our understanding, and hard cases constitute a small minority, then keep it. If the system becomes less than useful, then scrap it and replace it with a system based on different shared characteristics.” In the case of hydrogen and helium, for example, we agree with the suggestion of Schwerdtfeger et al ( 2020 ): “Although hydrogen and helium are clearly separate from the rest of the PTE, almost every chemist agrees that we can leave these elements in their current place in the PTE, keeping their distinctive quantum nature in mind [italics added].”…”
Section: Different Representations Of Periodicity: Chemical Narrativesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As long as a classification system is beneficial to economy of description , to structuring knowledge [italics added] and to our understanding, and hard cases constitute a small minority, then keep it. If the system becomes less than useful, then scrap it and replace it with a system based on different shared characteristics.” In the case of hydrogen and helium, for example, we agree with the suggestion of Schwerdtfeger et al ( 2020 ): “Although hydrogen and helium are clearly separate from the rest of the PTE, almost every chemist agrees that we can leave these elements in their current place in the PTE, keeping their distinctive quantum nature in mind [italics added].”…”
Section: Different Representations Of Periodicity: Chemical Narrativesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These superheavy elements show very unusual behavior compared to their lighter congeners due to strong relativistic effects. [8][9][10] For example Cn and Fl are predicted to be chemically inert [7,11,12] due to the relativistic 7s shell contraction for Cn and the large spin-orbit splitting of the 7p shell, resulting in a closed 7p 1/2 shell for Fl.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) is ignored, the contribution to ELF from the spin-current tensor density J is expected to be nonzero in relativistic superheavy atoms. For instance, the spin-orbit splitting for the valence 7p orbital of the element Og (Z = 118) is predicted to be very large, around 10 eV [14,73]. While Og is believed to be a spin-saturated system (the whole 7p shell is filled), this is not the case for, e.g., Fl (Z = 114, 7p 3/2 shell empty) for which J and the resulting spin-orbit current should be consider when analyzing the corresponding ELF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%