2008
DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of the regional climate model CLM in different climate regions, based on the example of precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COSMO-CLM model has been validated within several projects such as PRUDENCE Rockel and Geyer, 2008], and its response has been found to be in the same range of accuracy as other RCMs, resolving similar scales.…”
Section: 1002/2013jd021105mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COSMO-CLM model has been validated within several projects such as PRUDENCE Rockel and Geyer, 2008], and its response has been found to be in the same range of accuracy as other RCMs, resolving similar scales.…”
Section: 1002/2013jd021105mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes may be associated with the differences in the identified biases from the two dynamic vegetation simulations. PRESd2 introduced the highest magnitude of cold biases among the three historical climate simulations over most parts of West Africa, but PRES and PRESd1 underestimated temperature along the coast, orographic region, and north of 18° N. with [39,[65][66][67]. RegCM4 The model reproduced reasonably well the amplitude of the seasonal variations of temperature and precipitation over West Africa in all seasons with a strong correlation, which ranged from 0.5 to 0.9 (Figures 8 and 9).…”
Section: Regcm4 Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Previous regional climate model simulations over West Africa reported similar biases [18,30,[60][61][62][63][64]. The model biases were associated with different factors, such as the absence of sufficient observing stations in the mountainous region, the influence of land/sea boundary conditions, physics configuration of the model, inherited biases from the driving global circulation models (GCMs), or the choice of cumulus convective parameterization [39,[65][66][67].…”
Section: Regcm4 Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Climate change impact has been assessed by means of a simulation provided by the COSMO-Climate Limited-area Modeling (CCLM) [27] Regional Climate Model (RCM) using the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 [28] in the context of the EURO-CORDEX initiative (www.euro-cordex.net; a detailed description of the initiative can be found in [29]). The CCLM model performed dynamic downscaling of the MPI-ESM-LR (Max Planck Institute Earth System Model at base resolution) General Circulation Model (GCM) and was applied at a resolution of 0.11 • (approximately 12.5 km) both during the control period and the future scenario .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%