2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of peat-filled subsurface flow filters treating landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These materials strongly resist further degradation, which would contribute to elevated COD levels [45]. The low COD removals by peat was also found in other studies that employed a peat-filled substrate filter to treat landfill leachate and municipal wastewater, and only a 17% of COD removal efficiency was recorded when influent COD concentrations were well above 500 mg/L [46]. Table 4 indicates the statistical comparison of selected nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiencies and removal rates (g/m 2 d) between T1 and T2, T1 and T3, and T2 and T3, to evaluate their individual effect on the wetland reactors.…”
Section: Organics Removalmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These materials strongly resist further degradation, which would contribute to elevated COD levels [45]. The low COD removals by peat was also found in other studies that employed a peat-filled substrate filter to treat landfill leachate and municipal wastewater, and only a 17% of COD removal efficiency was recorded when influent COD concentrations were well above 500 mg/L [46]. Table 4 indicates the statistical comparison of selected nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiencies and removal rates (g/m 2 d) between T1 and T2, T1 and T3, and T2 and T3, to evaluate their individual effect on the wetland reactors.…”
Section: Organics Removalmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In peat, the accumulation of total P in the filter material was about 1.5 times to almost twofold. Kõiv et al (2009) have shown that P reduction in mineralised peat filters occurs by sorption phenomenon, which is limited by suitable sorption sites on peat fibres, and their removal efficiency falls when the sorption sites become saturated. During the water-treatment experiment, the removal capacity of phosphorus decreased gradually, and the filter lost its P-binding capacity after 5 months in operation, and the estimated maximum P-binding capacity in peat was in the order of 81 mg kg -1 of P for dry peat .…”
Section: P Accumulation In Experimental Soil Filters Used For Wastewamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical analysis of the filter materials showed that before the wastewater treatment experiment Kõiv et al, 2009Kõiv et al, , 2010, the hydrated oil shale ash sediment had an average of 530 mg P kg -1 , and after the experiment (6 months) 651 mg P kg -1 . Mineralised peat had an average of 330 mg P kg -1 before and 451 mg P kg -1 after the wastewater treatment experiment.…”
Section: P Accumulation In Experimental Soil Filters Used For Wastewamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few investigations have been made regarding the saturation of the mineral filler, but it decreases significantly after a period of 5−6 years [55,56]. Mineralized peat can also adsorb P by means of an unclear process when its concentration is higher than 1.5 mg·L −1 [57]. However, the only sustainable mechanism for TP removal is plant uptake and subsequent harvesting.…”
Section: Abatement Of Total Phosphorusmentioning
confidence: 99%