2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF) has been shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis in several liver diseases.AimsTo perform a meta-analysis to assess the performance of the ELF test for the assessment of liver fibrosis.StudyElectronic and manual searches were performed to identify studies of the ELF test. After methodological quality assessment and data extraction, pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(71 reference statements)
5
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test is a promising panel, incorporating three direct serum markers of fibrosis in an algorithm: hyaluronic acid, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP). [10,11] The ELF test was shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis and was furthermore able to predict clinical outcome in several independent populations and in patients with various etiologies of chronic liver disease. [12][13][14][15][16] Recently, the prognostic value of the ELF test in PSC was assessed in a large single center study from Norway including two independent PSC cohorts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test is a promising panel, incorporating three direct serum markers of fibrosis in an algorithm: hyaluronic acid, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP). [10,11] The ELF test was shown to accurately predict significant liver fibrosis and was furthermore able to predict clinical outcome in several independent populations and in patients with various etiologies of chronic liver disease. [12][13][14][15][16] Recently, the prognostic value of the ELF test in PSC was assessed in a large single center study from Norway including two independent PSC cohorts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available complex panels perform similarly for the detection of advanced fibrosis[5, 6], with reported area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) values of 0.8–0.9. However, a recent meta-analysis of nine studies evaluating the ELF test reported median sensitivity/specificity values of 78%/76% for advanced fibrosis, although the data-driven diagnostic cut-offs applied in different studies were a major cause of heterogeneity[7]. Using the ELF manufacturer’s cut-off for advanced fibrosis (≥9.8), we demonstrated 92% specificity and 74% sensitivity for the detection of advanced fibrosis in a mixed etiology CLD cohort[8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the marker was useful both as a continuous and as a categorical variable to look at the effect of isolated anti-HBc on fibrosis progression. Although hepatitis C is the most well-studied, ELF has been shown to correlate well with fibrosis severity in other hepatic diseases including hepatitis B, fatty liver, alcoholic liver disease and primary biliary cirrhosis 25,26,3133 . ELF has been found to correlate with clinical outcomes as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions at iQur Limited London, UK. The performance of ELF has been reported using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to describe its ability to detect histologically classified mild, moderate or severe fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C liver biopsies with excellent sensitivity and specificity 25,26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%