2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1375-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of DGT versus conventional soil phosphorus tests in tropical soils—maize and rice responses to P application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davidson et al 2000, Zhang et al 2002, so that one would expect uptake to be determined by physical availability. Recent work on the correlation of P uptake in plants and DGT have mostly been from tropical soils with high P sorption capacity (Mason et al 2010, Six et al 2013, where it can also be expected that physical availability determined uptake. Soils in temperate regions generally have lower sorption capacity than tropical soils, and it can therefore be expected that DGT will have somewhat lower predictive ability in those soils.…”
Section: (22) Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Davidson et al 2000, Zhang et al 2002, so that one would expect uptake to be determined by physical availability. Recent work on the correlation of P uptake in plants and DGT have mostly been from tropical soils with high P sorption capacity (Mason et al 2010, Six et al 2013, where it can also be expected that physical availability determined uptake. Soils in temperate regions generally have lower sorption capacity than tropical soils, and it can therefore be expected that DGT will have somewhat lower predictive ability in those soils.…”
Section: (22) Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new method based physical diffusion, diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) was originally developed to measure bioavailability of metals in natural waters (Davidson and Zhang 1994), and has also been developed to measure bioavailability in soil solution , Zhang et al 2001. It has recently also been developed for P bioavailability in soils (Zhang et al 2013) and it appears to predict plant available P better than any other single method (Mason et al 2010, Tandy et al 2011, Six et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unknown how effects of flooding on soil labile P and on normalH2PO4 sorption ( 33 P recovery) translate to soil P bioavailability for flooded rice, that is, to what extent flooded rice can benefit from released P. As far as we are aware, no data are available to state which chemical index of soil P availability explains P uptake in flooded rice in highly weathered soils. Our recent pot trial study with rainfed rice in weathered soil revealed that the resin P (AEM‐P) required in soil for 80% of maximal yield was 19 mg P/kg soil (Six et al ., ). Tables and combined show that flooding increased AEM‐P in unfertilized soil by a maximum of 11 mg P/kg soil (details not shown) to 13 mg P/kg soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard procedures to assess P availability in soils are based on one-step or fractionated batch experiments with various extractants (Ziadi et al, 2013). However, the results are difficult to relate directly to plant availability (Sibbesen, 1983;Six et al, 2013). Deepest insights in the dynamic aspects of P mobilization and immobilization in soils have been obtained with isotopic dilution techniques (Frossard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deepest insights in the dynamic aspects of P mobilization and immobilization in soils have been obtained with isotopic dilution techniques (Frossard et al, 2011). It has been shown that batch extracts mobilize P from pools not directly available to plants (Mason et al, 2013;Six et al, 2013). More comparable to the root's approach is to strip phosphate from the solid phase by lowering the soil-solution concentration, which can be achieved by establishing an infinite diffusional sink (Frossard et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%