1985
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740360612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of an SDS‐PAGE and an ELISA method for the quantitative analysis of soya protein in meat products: An international collaborative study

Abstract: The results are reported of a collaborative study in which five meat products containing different known levels of one of five different commercial soya ingredients, together with a blind duplicate and a blank, were analysed for soya protein by 26 laboratories in 10 European countries. Two techniques were tested: the sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). method of Armstrong et al. (J. Food Technol. 1982, 17, 327-337) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method of H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current assay methods for soy (DNA hybridization, immunoassay) are not accurate; their results are inconsistent and vary with the manufacturing process. Analysis based on molecular recognition before cooking is also inaccurate (Janssen et al, 1987;Armstrong et al, 1982;Olsman et al, 1985). Histochemical techniques, commonly used for analysis of meat products, can be used to identify soy regardless of the methods used for production, but measurement after heat treatment leads to signi® cant modi® cation of the different components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Current assay methods for soy (DNA hybridization, immunoassay) are not accurate; their results are inconsistent and vary with the manufacturing process. Analysis based on molecular recognition before cooking is also inaccurate (Janssen et al, 1987;Armstrong et al, 1982;Olsman et al, 1985). Histochemical techniques, commonly used for analysis of meat products, can be used to identify soy regardless of the methods used for production, but measurement after heat treatment leads to signi® cant modi® cation of the different components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10,27 Indeed, many researchers have tried different immunological techniques, such as immunodiffusion, Western blotting, dot-blot, and ELISA, for the analysis of soyabean proteins in products containing these proteins, 25,34,75, among those are meat products. They are all based on the reactivity between the antigen (soyabean proteins that are mainly glycinin and β-conglycinin) and the antiserum, which recognize only particular regions of the protein with a characteristic structure (epitopes).…”
Section: Immunochemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA has been useful whereas in analyzing soyabean proteins in meat products. 9,28,75,89,92,93,97,117,118,121 Most of these methods have used an indirect ELISA method for quantitation. 28,75,92,93,97,111,[115][116][117][118] For the detection of soyabean proteins in heated meats, Hitchcock et al 92 designed a strategy based on the denaturation-renaturation of soyabean proteins in both the sample to be tested and the antigenic preparation used for the antiserum production.…”
Section: Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been considered as one of the best methods in terms of its high specificity and sensitivity of detection for the target proteins and peptides, and large throughput of samples (Eldridge and Holmes 1979;Olsman et al 1985;Medina 1988). An ELISA kit developed for soya protein determination is commercially available (Rittenburg et a1 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%