Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1983
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90188-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
588
1
57

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 915 publications
(664 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
18
588
1
57
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that qualitative family level data provided an adequate classification for use in routine biomonitoring (Table 6). Similar results have been obtained by many, including Furse et al (1981), Armitage et al (1983), Castella et al (1995), Dallas (1995) and Zamora-Munoz and Alba-Tercedor (1996), indicating that, despite the opinion of some authors (Growns et al, 1995), the necessary information about water quality can be provided by qualitative family level data.…”
Section: Effect Of Taxonomic Resolution and Quantification On The Accsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It was found that qualitative family level data provided an adequate classification for use in routine biomonitoring (Table 6). Similar results have been obtained by many, including Furse et al (1981), Armitage et al (1983), Castella et al (1995), Dallas (1995) and Zamora-Munoz and Alba-Tercedor (1996), indicating that, despite the opinion of some authors (Growns et al, 1995), the necessary information about water quality can be provided by qualitative family level data.…”
Section: Effect Of Taxonomic Resolution and Quantification On The Accsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The sampling sites were well distributed spatially, and the coverage was roughly the same for France, Slovakia and Estonia (1 site for 140 to 270 km 2 of land area), but denser for UK (1 site for 33 km 2 ). In Estonia, the index used was the Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT), which is based on family-level data (Armitage et al, 1983). The ASPT is a rather robust indicator able to reflect general degradation.…”
Section: Biological Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores of the IBMWP (0 ->100) have been grouped in 5 quality classes [30]. Other index as NFAM (number of families) and IASPT (Iberian Average Score per Taxon) [26,32] were also obtained. The Equivalent Quality Ratio (EQR) was obtained [33,34].…”
Section: Environmental Parameters Water Status Indicators and Qualitmentioning
confidence: 99%