2005
DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.69.3.49.66362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance Implications of Fit among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior

Abstract: Adopting a contingency perspective, the authors present and test a fit-as-moderation model that posits that overall firm performance is influenced by how well the marketing organization's structural characteristics (i.e., formalization, centralization, and specialization) and strategic behavioral emphases (i.e., customer, competitor, innovation, and cost control) complement alternative business strategies (i.e., prospector, analyzer, low-cost defender, and differentiated defender). Responses from 228 senior ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
638
3
44

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 681 publications
(755 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
25
638
3
44
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that marketoriented organizations with creative strategies are well focused on consumers' latent needs. Noble and Mokwa (1999) On the other hand, different researches assessed the interaction between marketing organizational structures and product-market strategies (Olson, Slater, & Hult, 2005b), and performance and market orientations (Ishaq, 2013;Matsuno & Mentzer, 2000;Slater et al, 2010;Vorhies & Morgan, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that marketoriented organizations with creative strategies are well focused on consumers' latent needs. Noble and Mokwa (1999) On the other hand, different researches assessed the interaction between marketing organizational structures and product-market strategies (Olson, Slater, & Hult, 2005b), and performance and market orientations (Ishaq, 2013;Matsuno & Mentzer, 2000;Slater et al, 2010;Vorhies & Morgan, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miles & Snow, 1978;Miller, 1986;Lukas, 1999;Olson, Slater & Hult, 2005). Thus, a firm must not only find the configuration of proactive and responsive market orientation that is the right fit for its present circumstances, but also anticipate and adapt to how this "sweet spot" might evolve over time as the firm's capabilities develop and the market environment changes.…”
Section: How To Create Proactive Market Strategies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venkatraman, 1989;Narver & Slater, 1990;Gatignon & Xuereb, 1997;Noble, Sinha & Kumar, 2002) and strategic behavior (e.g. Burgelman, 1983;Olson, Slater & Hult, 2005;Slater, Hult & Olson, 2007), which represent important strategic antecedents and consequences of firm action. Moreover, market orientation is to a large degree a strategic orientation (Narver & Slater, 1990;Deshpandé et al, 1993) and proactive action has a large impact on behavior (Bateman & Crant, 1993;Grant & Ashford, 2008), meaning that the two terms must both be taken into consideration when conceptualizing market strategy using the theoretical foundations of this thesis.…”
Section: A Framework For Conceptualizing Market Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations