2010
DOI: 10.1108/s0885-3339(2010)0000011007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance impact of financial participation: subjective and objective measures compared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research designs such as quasi-experimental or longitudinal studies should be conducted in the future to test the relationships posited here in a causal context. Lastly, our data was gathered using a single respondent approach, which was deemed better than using a number of less informed respondents (Kalmi & Sweins, 2010). This is in spite of the fact that single respondents can introduce single respondent bias.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research designs such as quasi-experimental or longitudinal studies should be conducted in the future to test the relationships posited here in a causal context. Lastly, our data was gathered using a single respondent approach, which was deemed better than using a number of less informed respondents (Kalmi & Sweins, 2010). This is in spite of the fact that single respondents can introduce single respondent bias.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicate positive effects from PRP (Piekkola 2005 andJones et al 2008a), whereas studies have indicated no significant performance effects either from stock options (Jones et al 2010;Mäkinen 2010) or personnel funds (Kalmi and Sweins 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While some researchers argue that organizational research should take measures to reduce single respondent bias (see Kumar et al, 1993), the nature of the NCAA teams meant that the organizational and management structure of the teams is not as layered as it is in many organizations. Kalmi and Sweins (2010) argue that a single, well-informed source of data is more effective than less-informed respondents. Since head coaches have the most information on the team and all the players are relative newcomers to NCAA basketball, head coaches can be argued to be the best sources of information on the team.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%