2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance enhancements of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for domestic sludge treatment – A State-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
198
1
17

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
198
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) [8,9], anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) [10], and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) [7,11,12] are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater. Despite the effective chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal by these anaerobic biotechnologies, some challenges still exist, such as complex three-phase separator and long solids' retention time of UASB, membrane fouling and high energy costs of AnMBR, and high land footprint of ABR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) [8,9], anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) [10], and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) [7,11,12] are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater. Despite the effective chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal by these anaerobic biotechnologies, some challenges still exist, such as complex three-phase separator and long solids' retention time of UASB, membrane fouling and high energy costs of AnMBR, and high land footprint of ABR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater by using high rate reactors such as an UASB system, along with its new upgrades and modified versions, is expectable to keep growing in the coming years, above all, due to the fact the systems are more and more efficient and present a low carbon footprint in comparison with the traditional activated sludge systems (Chong et al 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSSAB showed high performance for wastewater treatment at moderate and low temperatures (25 -10 °C) than both TCAB and UASB, which the averages of COD removal efficiency are 88%, 80%, and 78% for SSSAB, TCAB, and UASB reactor relatively. Chong [13]reported that at low temperatures (≤20 °C), because of the relatively high accumulation of suspended solids in the sludge bed which results in insufficient solids retention time, the performance of anaerobic reactors was found to reduce, in spite of that SSSAB showed good performance at moderate and low temperatures. McCarty [14] reported that an optimum pH range of anaerobic treatment is about 7.0 to7.2, but it can proceed quite well with a pH varying from about 6.6 to 7.6.…”
Section: Bioreactor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%