2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2014-11930-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perfect local $Tb$ Theorem and twisted Martingale transforms

Abstract: A local Tb Theorem provides a flexible framework for proving the boundedness of a Calderón-Zygmund operator T . One needs only boundedness of the operator T on systems of locally pseudo-accretive functions {b Q }, indexed by cubes. We give a new proof of this Theorem in the setting of perfect (dyadic) models of Calderón-Zygmund operators, imposing integrability conditions on the b Q functions that are the weakest possible. The proof is a simple direct argument, based upon an inequality for transforms of so-cal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our argument is direct in the sense that it avoids a reduction to the so-called perfect dyadic case such as that seen in Auscher and Yang [2]. A companion paper [18] addresses a perfect dyadic variant of Theorem 1.2 for the full range 1 < p 1 , p 2 < ∞; it contains many of the features of the argument in the present paper, with significantly fewer technicalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our argument is direct in the sense that it avoids a reduction to the so-called perfect dyadic case such as that seen in Auscher and Yang [2]. A companion paper [18] addresses a perfect dyadic variant of Theorem 1.2 for the full range 1 < p 1 , p 2 < ∞; it contains many of the features of the argument in the present paper, with significantly fewer technicalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There are also tools in § 3 that are useful, namely martingale transform inequalities for twisted martingale differences, and the associated half-twisted inequalities that are universal in that they hold in all L q -spaces. These inequalities also play a crucial role in [1,Lemma 5.3] and in [18].…”
Section: Outline Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since then, research work on this subject has been continuously growing with special focus on more general criteria of boundedness ( [1], [14], [13]), variants that apply to new settings ([12], [11], [15]) and applications to PDEs ( [8], [10]). The articles [7], [9], [2], [17] and the books [4], [5], [16], [23] provide detailed accounts of the evolution of this theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , Nazarov, Treil and Volberg proved, in a non‐doubling measure setup, that it suffices to assume bQ1,bQ2L and TbQ1,T*bQ2 BMO uniformly in Q. Auscher, Hofmann, Muscalu, Tao and Thiele , for dyadic model operators, relaxed these conditions assuming only bQ1Lp, bQ2Lq, TbQ1Lq and T*bQ2Lp for any p,q(1,) where the different norms are appropriately scaled relative to |Q|, see also .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%