2001
DOI: 10.1121/1.1348009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production

Abstract: The effect of talker and token variability on speech perception has engendered a great deal of research. However, most of this research has compared listener performance in multiple-talker (or variable) situations to performance in single-talker conditions. It remains unclear to what extent listeners are affected by the degree of variability within a talker, rather than simply the existence of variability (being in a multitalker environment). The present study has two goals: First, the degree of variability am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
185
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
185
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would therefore be interesting to investigate the possibility of covert phonetic contrasts on children's apparent omission of third person singular -s. This suggests that further acoustic analysis, both of the input children hear (cf. Newman, Clouse, & Burnham, 2001) and of child productions, would provide further evidence of this morpheme in children's underlying phonological representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It would therefore be interesting to investigate the possibility of covert phonetic contrasts on children's apparent omission of third person singular -s. This suggests that further acoustic analysis, both of the input children hear (cf. Newman, Clouse, & Burnham, 2001) and of child productions, would provide further evidence of this morpheme in children's underlying phonological representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is known that speakers of a language exhibit individual differences for a variety of phonetic categories, for both production (Hillenbrand et al 1995, Peterson and Barney 1952, Newman et al 2001, Allen et al 2003, Byrd 1992, Zue & Laferriere 1979, Espy-Wilson et al 2000, Hashi et al 2003 and perception (Liberman et al, 1957;Theodore et al, 2013). Fitting the model to aggregate rather than individual participants' data could affect our inferences about where individual phonemes are located on the τ continuum.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The /p-b/ VOT contrast and the /s-∫/ contrast were chosen because they have previously been used to examine speaker variability in speech production (e.g. Allen, Miller, & DeSteno, 2003;Newman, Clouse, & Burnham, 2001;Theodore, Miller, & DeSteno, 2009). The 36 keywords were divided into three sets, and each set of 12 was used for a different picture theme (i.e.…”
Section: Development Of Diapixuk Task Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%