The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a gap in knowledge and understanding relating to the experiences of women exposed to the opportunity of waterbirth. Our aim was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who achieved or did not achieve their planned waterbirth.MethodsAn exploratory design using critical incident techniques was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016, in the birth centre of the tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Women were telephoned 6 weeks post birth. Demographic data included: age; education; parity; and previous birth mode. Women were also asked the following: what made you choose to plan a waterbirth?; what do you think contributed to you having (or not having) a waterbirth?; and which three words would you use to describe your birth experience? Frequency distributions and univariate comparisons were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from the interviews.ResultsA total of 31% (93 of 296) of women achieved a waterbirth and 69% (203 of 296) did not. Multiparous women were more likely to achieve a waterbirth (57% vs 32%; p < 0.001). Women who achieved a waterbirth were less likely to have planned a waterbirth for pain relief (38% vs 52%; p = 0.24). The primary reasons women gave for planning a waterbirth were: pain relief; they liked the idea; it was associated with a natural birth; it provided a relaxing environment; and it was recommended. Two fifths (40%) of women who achieved a waterbirth suggested support was the primary reason they achieved their waterbirth, with the midwife named as the primary support person by 34 of 37 women. Most (66%) women who did not achieve a waterbirth perceived this was because they experienced an obstetric complication. The words women used to describe their birth were coded as: affirming; distressing; enduring; natural; quick; empowering; and long.ConclusionsImmersion in water for birth facilitates a shift of focus from high risk obstetric-led care to low risk midwifery-led care. It also facilitates evidence based, respectful midwifery care which in turn optimises the potential for women to view their birthing experience through a positive lens.

Testing the waters — A cross-sectional survey of views about waterbirth among Swedish health professionals

“…In Study III, midwives advocating waterbirth took the view that it is a natural way of giving birth, while physicians disapprovingly described waterbirth as unnatural. Midwives have formerly described assisting in waterbirth as something that contributes to a calm, peaceful and more "instinctive birthing", which is empowering and helps to create a "woman-centred atmosphere" (168).…”

Beneficios de la hidroterapia en el trabajo de parto. Estudio de revisión.

“…Solo se encontró un único artículo que analizara las motivaciones de las gestantes. En este artículo, de Lewis et al (2018), se identifican las razones por las cuales las gestantes deciden tener un parto acuático, siendo el alivio del dolor la razón que tiene más.…”

Midwives’ experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth

“…The provision of water immersion for labour and birth is facilitated by midwives working within low risk midwifery-led models of care who are deemed competent to provide this method of birth [ 1 , 2 ]. The concept of competence is often aligned with confidence [ 3 ], but distinguishing between these two concepts is important as they are not always synonymous.…”