2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799002676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring

Abstract: Background. To test the hypothesis that certain psychotic symptomatology is due to a defect in selfmonitoring, we investigated the ability of groups of psychiatric patients to differentiate perceptually between self-produced and externally produced tactile stimuli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
280
1
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
23
280
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with positive symptoms tend to overattribute to themselves actions performed by others or, conversely, to attribute their own actions or thoughts to the influence of others. When placed in experimental situations like those already described in the previous sections, these patients were found to systematically misattribute their movements or those of the experimenter [15,16,28,60].…”
Section: Conclusion a Neural Hypothesis For Self-recognition And Itsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Patients with positive symptoms tend to overattribute to themselves actions performed by others or, conversely, to attribute their own actions or thoughts to the influence of others. When placed in experimental situations like those already described in the previous sections, these patients were found to systematically misattribute their movements or those of the experimenter [15,16,28,60].…”
Section: Conclusion a Neural Hypothesis For Self-recognition And Itsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Those without delusions of control or other symptoms (regardless of diagnosis) reported that self produced sensations were less tickly, intense and pleasant than those produced by the experimenter. Those with delusions of control or other symptoms (regardless of diagnosis) by contrast reported no difference between self and other produced stimuli on any of these scales (Blakemore et al, 2000(Blakemore et al, , p. 1136). This suggests that those with delusions of control could not tell who produced the action.…”
Section: Self Ticklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that in normal subjects self produced stimuli appear less intense because they are predicted based on the motor commands (Blakemore et al, 2000(Blakemore et al, , p. 1137. If those suffering delusions of control fail to produce predictions, or lack appropriate access to them, this phenomenon could not occur.…”
Section: Self Ticklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this, patients who suffer from hallucinations and delusions exhibit unusually large responses to predictable or unimportant stimuli (Jensen et al, 2008), and smaller responses to important stimuli compared to controls (Murray et al, 2008). Additionally, high-level systems fail to predict and downregulate responses to the sensory consequences of patients' own actions or speech (Blakemore et al, 2000;Ford & Mathalon, 2004;Shergill et al, 2005). It therefore seems likely that hallucinations and delusions are linked to abnormal communication and connectivity between high-level and sensory cortex (Mechelli et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hallucinations and Delusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%