2012
DOI: 10.5897/ajbm11.2345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perception of self-esteem and self-efficacy as transforming factors in the sources of role stress and job satisfaction relationship of employees: A trial of a staged model based on the artificial neural network method

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the relationship between sources of role stress (role conflict-role ambiguity) and job satisfaction, and to determine what role the self-esteem and self-efficacy perceptions of employees can assume in trying to make this relationship positive. Within the scope of the study, a questionnaire with proven validity and reliability was applied to 309 nurses employed in Kirikkale Provincial Center (Turkey). The artificial neural network method was used for the analysis of the data. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of previous experiments support the opinion that the strategy of combining different methods (physical surface tension theory and artificial neural networks) may improve predictive performance. Similar strategies have been applied previously to work safety and health classification problems, for work stress, psychosocial factor, and mental stress factor prediction (Jackofsky, Ferris & Breckenridge, 1986;Somers, 1999;Zorlu, 2012;Sriramprakash, Prasanna & Murthy, 2017;Subhani et al, 2017;Xia, Malik & Subhani, 2018;Lotfan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous experiments support the opinion that the strategy of combining different methods (physical surface tension theory and artificial neural networks) may improve predictive performance. Similar strategies have been applied previously to work safety and health classification problems, for work stress, psychosocial factor, and mental stress factor prediction (Jackofsky, Ferris & Breckenridge, 1986;Somers, 1999;Zorlu, 2012;Sriramprakash, Prasanna & Murthy, 2017;Subhani et al, 2017;Xia, Malik & Subhani, 2018;Lotfan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress is a trigger for some managerial and organizational problems. The issue that must be prioritized is how to eliminate sources of stress (Zorlu, 2012). Robbins & Judge (2013), describe stress as a dynamic condition in which individuals are faced with opportunities, demands, and resources related to individual desires, where the results are felt to be doubtful and important.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used an adapted modified survey questionnaire from five related studies. Part 1 includes employee conflict indicators comprising work-family and family-work types of conflict (Mansour & Tremblay, 2016), part 2 consists employee technostress indicators including techno-pile, techno-invasion, and techno-complexity (Farid et al, 2021), part 3 consists of employee performance indicators referring to work quality, work target, and speed (Marasigan, 2020), part 4 consists job satisfaction indicators such as salary, supervision, and promotion (Zorlu, 2012), and part 5 consists of single-item questions for the control variables regarding job demand and job control (Chandra et al, 2015). The questionnaire was carefully modified for the present study.…”
Section: Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%